🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the clinical challenge of delayed lymphoma subtype diagnosis due to reliance on costly equipment and scarce expert pathologists. We propose a novel deep learning–based diagnostic paradigm leveraging routine hematoxylin–eosin (HE)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs). To this end, we construct the first multi-center HE-WSI benchmark dataset encompassing four lymphoma subtypes and normal tissue. We systematically evaluate foundational pathology models—including H-optimus-1 and Virchow2—integrated with AB-MIL and TransMIL multiple-instance learning (MIL) frameworks across 10×, 20×, and 40× magnifications. This work establishes the first multi-center MIL benchmark for lymphoma classification, revealing that 40× magnification alone achieves optimal performance without cross-magnification fusion. In-distribution balanced accuracy exceeds 80%, yet drops sharply to ~60% under out-of-distribution settings, exposing critical generalization limitations. We publicly release a full-stack evaluation toolkit to advance clinically deployable AI-assisted pathological diagnosis.
📝 Abstract
Timely and accurate lymphoma diagnosis is essential for guiding cancer treatment. Standard diagnostic practice combines hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained whole slide images with immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and molecular genetic tests to determine lymphoma subtypes, a process requiring costly equipment, skilled personnel, and causing treatment delays. Deep learning methods could assist pathologists by extracting diagnostic information from routinely available HE-stained slides, yet comprehensive benchmarks for lymphoma subtyping on multicenter data are lacking. In this work, we present the first multicenter lymphoma benchmarking dataset covering four common lymphoma subtypes and healthy control tissue. We systematically evaluate five publicly available pathology foundation models (H-optimus-1, H0-mini, Virchow2, UNI2, Titan) combined with attention-based (AB-MIL) and transformer-based (TransMIL) multiple instance learning aggregators across three magnifications (10x, 20x, 40x). On in-distribution test sets, models achieve multiclass balanced accuracies exceeding 80% across all magnifications, with all foundation models performing similarly and both aggregation methods showing comparable results. The magnification study reveals that 40x resolution is sufficient, with no performance gains from higher resolutions or cross-magnification aggregation. However, on out-of-distribution test sets, performance drops substantially to around 60%, highlighting significant generalization challenges. To advance the field, larger multicenter studies covering additional rare lymphoma subtypes are needed. We provide an automated benchmarking pipeline to facilitate such future research.