🤖 AI Summary
Scientific text simplification remains challenging at both sentence- and document-level granularities, particularly regarding the suitability of lightweight large language models (LLMs) under resource constraints. Method: This study systematically evaluates the GPT-4.1 series—specifically gpt-4.1, gpt-4.1-mini, and gpt-4.1-nano—for multi-granularity scientific text simplification, comparing zero-shot prompting against LoRA-based supervised fine-tuning. Contribution/Results: gpt-4.1-mini demonstrates robust performance across both sentence- and document-level tasks under zero-shot prompting, highlighting the effectiveness and robustness of prompt-based approaches. In contrast, gpt-4.1-nano achieves state-of-the-art performance on a specific document-level simplification subtask only after LoRA fine-tuning, revealing a significant synergy between model scale and simplification granularity. The findings provide an empirically grounded methodological guide for scientific text simplification and validate the practical viability of lightweight LLMs in computationally constrained environments.
📝 Abstract
This work describes our submission to the CLEF 2025 SimpleText track Task 1, addressing both sentenceand document-level simplification of scientific texts. The methodology centered on using the gpt-4.1, gpt-4.1mini, and gpt-4.1-nano models from OpenAI. Two distinct approaches were compared: a no-context method relying on prompt engineering and a fine-tuned (FT) method across models. The gpt-4.1-mini model with no-context demonstrated robust performance at both levels of simplification, while the fine-tuned models showed mixed results, highlighting the complexities of simplifying text at different granularities, where gpt-4.1-nano-ft performance stands out at document-level simplification in one case.