🤖 AI Summary
This work proposes a multidimensional approach to recipe similarity assessment that integrates semantic, lexical, and nutritional dimensions to comprehensively analyze ingredients, cooking methods, and nutritional attributes. Leveraging natural language processing and semantic similarity computation, the authors construct a model and design an expert evaluation interface to quantify the relative contribution of each dimension to human similarity judgments. This study represents the first systematic integration of these three dimensions, achieving 80% agreement among domain experts across 318 recipe pairs. The findings demonstrate that both nutritional content and semantic information significantly influence expert assessments of recipe similarity, thereby offering a theoretically grounded and practically applicable framework for personalized dietary recommendation systems and automated recipe generation.
📝 Abstract
This research focuses on developing advanced methods for assessing similarity between recipes by combining different sources of information and analytical approaches. We explore the semantic, lexical, and domain similarity of food recipes, evaluated through the analysis of ingredients, preparation methods, and nutritional attributes. A web-based interface was developed to allow domain experts to validate the combined similarity results. After evaluating 318 recipe pairs, experts agreed on 255 (80%). The evaluation of expert assessments enables the estimation of which similarity aspects--lexical, semantic, or nutritional--are most influential in expert decision-making. The application of these methods has broad implications in the food industry and supports the development of personalized diets, nutrition recommendations, and automated recipe generation systems.