🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the hallucination problem in low-resource Sinhala-English neural machine translation caused by weak cross-lingual alignment, proposing a reference-free hallucination detection framework. Methodologically, five linguistically motivated corruption strategies are designed to generate training data, and a character-similarity-based semantic rescue mechanism is introduced to distinguish morphological variants from hallucinations. The detection system integrates multiple signals, including mDeBERTa-v3 sequence labeling, LaBSE embeddings, and neural risk scores. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a token-level F1 score of 0.841 and a sentence-level AUROC of 0.970 on a source-divergent test set, effectively validating the detector's genuine reliance on source texts.
📝 Abstract
Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models, while capable of producing highly fluent outputs, remain vulnerable to hallucinations, which are translations that are natural yet semantically unrelated to the source. This vulnerability is acute in low-resource settings like Sinhala-to-English, where weak cross-lingual alignment leads to hallucinations. This paper introduces a framework for reference-free hallucination detection in this language pair. We present a 45,000-sample synthetic dataset generated through a probabilistic chain of five linguistically motivated corruption strategies, with a semantic rescue mechanism that uses character-level similarity to distinguish hallucinations from morphological variants. We fine-tune mDeBERTa-v3 for token-level sequence labelling, reaching a token-level F1 of 0.841 +/- 0.001 over three seeds on a source-disjoint test set, and study a three-signal ensemble integrating neural risk scores, sequence log-probabilities, and cross-lingual semantic embeddings (LaBSE). A source-ablation control shows that the detector relies on the Sinhala source rather than on surface artefacts of the corruption process: shuffling or removing the source reduces sentence-level AUROC from 0.970 to chance. We benchmark eight NMT systems spanning five model families and find that detector firings vary by an order of magnitude across architectures.