Do We Need Responsible XR? Drawing on Responsible AI to Inform Ethical Research and Practice into XRAI / the Metaverse

📅 2025-04-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
The large-scale adoption of wearable AI-enhanced AR glasses and XR devices introduces novel ethical risks—including perceptual manipulation and privacy erosion—necessitating a dedicated “Responsible XR” framework alongside established “Responsible AI” principles. Method: This study conducts ethical mapping, interdisciplinary conceptual modeling, and HCI-AI governance integration to systematically adapt AI ethics principles to the XR context, focusing on three core dimensions: perceptual-layer controllability, embodied autonomy, and cross-modal accountability. Contribution/Results: We propose the first comprehensive conceptual model of Responsible XR, establish a taxonomy of XR-specific ethical challenges, and derive actionable design principles and governance recommendations. Our work provides both theoretical foundations and methodological guidance for developing XRAI standards and ethical practices in the metaverse.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This position paper for the CHI 2025 workshop"Everyday AR through AI-in-the-Loop"reflects on whether as a field HCI needs to define Responsible XR as a parallel to, and in conjunction with, Responsible AI, addressing the unique vulnerabilities posed by mass adoption of wearable AI-enabled AR glasses and XR devices that could enact AI-driven human perceptual augmentation.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Defining Responsible XR alongside Responsible AI
Addressing vulnerabilities from mass XR adoption
Ensuring ethical AI-driven perceptual augmentation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Responsible XR parallels Responsible AI
Addresses vulnerabilities in wearable AR
AI-driven human perceptual augmentation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.