CSI Prediction Frameworks for Enhanced 5G Link Adaptation: Performance-Complexity Trade-offs

📅 2025-11-25
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
In 5G link adaptation, inaccurate and delayed channel state information (CSI) arises from channel aging, user mobility, and feedback latency. To address this, this paper proposes two CSI prediction frameworks tailored for TDD and FDD systems, innovatively modeling prediction in the effective SINR domain to jointly optimize accuracy and computational efficiency. We systematically compare Wiener filtering against deep learning methods—including GRU, LSTM, and delay-aware DNN—under dual metrics: mean squared error (MSE) and floating-point operations (FLOPs), evaluating prediction accuracy, complexity, and generalization across diverse channel conditions. Results show that when second-order channel statistics are known, Wiener filtering achieves near-GRU accuracy with significantly lower computational cost; conversely, GRU demonstrates superior generalization under unknown or time-varying channel statistics. The study recommends deep learning (e.g., GRU) for TDD systems, while advocating lightweight classical methods (e.g., Wiener filtering) for FDD systems, thereby revealing architecture-dependent optimal paradigms for CSI prediction.

Technology Category

Computer Vision: Learning & Optimization for CVMachine Learning: Transfer, Domain Adaptation, Multi-Task LearningCognitive Modeling & Cognitive Systems: Other Foundations of Cognitive Modeling & Systems

Application Category

Systems and Infrastructure for Web, Mobile and WoT: Applied ML and AI for Web-based mobile applicationsGraph Algorithms and Modeling for the Web: Graph neural networks and deep learning approaches for Web-related graphsSocial Networks and Social Media: Influence propagation, information diffusion, and the prediction on networks
📝 Abstract
Accurate and timely channel state information (CSI) is fundamental for efficient link adaptation. However, challenges such as channel aging, user mobility, and feedback delays significantly impact the performance of adaptive modulation and coding (AMC). This paper proposes and evaluates two CSI prediction frameworks applicable to both time division duplexing (TDD) and frequency division duplexing (FDD) systems. The proposed methods operate in the effective signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) domain to reduce complexity while preserving predictive accuracy. A comparative analysis is conducted between a classical Wiener filter and state-of-the-art deep learning frameworks based on gated recurrent units (GRUs), long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, and a delayed deep neural network (DNN). The evaluation considers the accuracy of the prediction in terms of mean squared error (MSE), the performance of the system, and the complexity of the implementation regarding floating point operations (FLOPs). Furthermore, we investigate the generalizability of both approaches under various propagation conditions. The simulation results show that the Wiener filter performs close to GRU in terms of MSE and throughput with lower computational complexity, provided that the second-order statistics of the channel are available. However, the GRU model exhibits enhanced generalization across different channel scenarios. These findings suggest that while learningbased solutions are well-suited for TDD systems where the base station (BS) handles the computation, the lower complexity of classical methods makes them a preferable choice for FDD setups, where prediction occurs at the power-constrained user equipment (UE).
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addressing channel aging and feedback delays in 5G link adaptation
Proposing CSI prediction frameworks for TDD and FDD systems
Analyzing performance-complexity trade-offs between classical and deep learning methods
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

CSI prediction frameworks for TDD and FDD systems
Operating in SINR domain to reduce complexity
Comparing Wiener filter with deep learning methods
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
F
Francisco Díaz-Ruiz
Communications and Signal Processing Lab, Telecommunication Research Institute (TELMA), Universidad de Málaga, E.T.S. Ingeniería de Telecomunicación, Bulevar Louis Pasteur 35, 29010 Málaga (Spain)
Francisco J. Martín-Vega
Francisco J. Martín-Vega
Communications and Signal Processing Lab, Telecommunication Research Institute (TELMA), Universidad de Málaga, E.T.S. Ingeniería de Telecomunicación, Bulevar Louis Pasteur 35, 29010 Málaga (Spain)
J
Jose A. Cortés
Communications and Signal Processing Lab, Telecommunication Research Institute (TELMA), Universidad de Málaga, E.T.S. Ingeniería de Telecomunicación, Bulevar Louis Pasteur 35, 29010 Málaga (Spain)
Gerardo Gómez
Gerardo Gómez
Communications and Signal Processing Lab, Telecommunication Research Institute (TELMA), Universidad de Málaga, E.T.S. Ingeniería de Telecomunicación, Bulevar Louis Pasteur 35, 29010 Málaga (Spain)
M
Mari Carmen Aguayo
Communications and Signal Processing Lab, Telecommunication Research Institute (TELMA), Universidad de Málaga, E.T.S. Ingeniería de Telecomunicación, Bulevar Louis Pasteur 35, 29010 Málaga (Spain)