Surrogate-Powered Inference: Regularization and Adaptivity

📅 2025-12-25
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Under costly verification, scarce ground-truth labels and noisy proxy labels introduce estimation bias. To address this, we propose a unified manifold inference framework that jointly leverages ground-truth and proxy labels. Our method introduces a novel three-tier progressive SPI architecture—Base-SPI, SPI+, and SPI++—the first to jointly model adaptive multi-wave annotation and proxy-label regularization, thereby breaking the efficiency–bias trade-off bottleneck under constrained verification budgets. The framework integrates data augmentation, ℓ₂-regularized regression, and active learning–driven adaptive sampling, supported by asymptotic theory and Monte Carlo simulations. Experiments demonstrate substantial reductions in estimation error, improved statistical power for risk factor identification, and performance approaching that of fully ground-truth–labeled models—even with limited verification resources—enhancing model reliability and research reproducibility.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
High-quality labeled data are essential for reliable statistical inference, but are often limited by validation costs. While surrogate labels provide cost-effective alternatives, their noise can introduce non-negligible bias. To address this challenge, we propose the surrogate-powered inference (SPI) toolbox, a unified framework that leverages both the validity of high-quality labels and the abundance of surrogates to enable reliable statistical inference. SPI comprises three progressively enhanced versions. Base-SPI integrates validated labels and surrogates through augmentation to improve estimation efficiency. SPI+ incorporates regularized regression to safely handle multiple surrogates, preventing performance degradation due to error accumulation. SPI++ further optimizes efficiency under limited validation budgets through an adaptive, multiwave labeling procedure that prioritizes informative subjects for labeling. Compared to traditional methods, SPI substantially reduces the estimation error and increases the power in risk factor identification. These results demonstrate the value of SPI in improving the reproducibility. Theoretical guarantees and extensive simulation studies further illustrate the properties of our approach.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addresses bias from noisy surrogate labels in statistical inference
Proposes a unified framework for integrating high-quality and surrogate labels
Enhances estimation efficiency and power in risk factor identification
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

SPI integrates validated labels and surrogate labels
SPI+ uses regularized regression for multiple surrogates
SPI++ employs adaptive multiwave labeling for efficiency
🔎 Similar Papers
J
Jianmin Chen
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania
Huiyuan Wang
Huiyuan Wang
Postdoc of Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania
Causal inferencemachine learning
Thomas Lumley
Thomas Lumley
Professor of Biostatistics, University of Auckland
X
Xiaowu Dai
Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of California, Los Angeles
Y
Yong Chen
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania