Predicting and Interpolating Spatiotemporal Environmental Data: A Case Study of Groundwater Storage in Bangladesh

📅 2025-11-27
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Sparse spatiotemporal observations—e.g., groundwater storage in Bangladesh—hinder accurate continuous field reconstruction. Method: We propose a hybrid spatiotemporal modeling framework integrating deep learning with geostatistical interpolation. Departing from conventional “aggregate-then-model” or “model-then-interpolate” paradigms, our approach innovatively employs time-series dynamic clustering to guide spatial interpolation, explicitly encoding geological uncertainty’s influence on temporal evolution. It combines grid-to-grid/point deep learning prediction with kriging interpolation and identifies dynamically similar yet non-neighboring observation regions via adaptive similarity metrics. Contribution/Results: Experiments demonstrate significantly higher temporal forecasting accuracy than pure spatial interpolation; proximity does not imply dynamic similarity; and the method exhibits superior interpolation robustness and physical interpretability—particularly for latent driving variables such as groundwater storage.

Technology Category

Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Geometric, Spatial, and Temporal ReasoningData Mining & Knowledge Management: Mining of Spatial, Temporal or Spatio-Temporal DataPlanning, Routing, and Scheduling: Optimization of Spatio-temporal Systems

Application Category

Graph Algorithms and Modeling for the Web: Graph neural networks and deep learning approaches for Web-related graphsUser Modeling, Personalization and Recommendation: Explainable and interpretable methods for personalizationWeb Mining and Content Analysis: Models for Web evolution
📝 Abstract
Geospatial observational datasets are often limited to point measurements, making temporal prediction and spatial interpolation essential for constructing continuous fields. This study evaluates two deep learning strategies for addressing this challenge: (1) a grid-to-grid approach, where gridded predictors are used to model rasterised targets (aggregation before modelling), and (2) a grid-to-point approach, where gridded predictors model point targets, followed by kriging interpolation to fill the domain (aggregation after modelling). Using groundwater storage data from Bangladesh as a case study, we compare the effcacy of these approaches. Our findings indicate that spatial interpolation is substantially more difficult than temporal prediction. In particular, nearest neighbours are not always the most similar, and uncertainties in geology strongly influence point temporal behaviour. These insights motivate future work on advanced interpolation methods informed by clustering locations based on time series dynamics. Demonstrated on groundwater storage, the conclusions are applicable to other environmental variables governed by indirectly observable factors. Code is available at https://github.com/pazolka/interpolation-prediction-gwsa.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Compares deep learning methods for spatiotemporal prediction and interpolation
Evaluates grid-to-grid versus grid-to-point approaches using groundwater data
Highlights challenges in spatial interpolation due to geological uncertainties
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Grid-to-grid deep learning for raster targets
Grid-to-point modeling with kriging interpolation
Clustering locations based on time series dynamics
A
Anna Pazola
Department of Computer Science, Brunel University of London, UK
M
Mohammad Shamsudduha
Department of Risk and Disaster Reduction, UCL, London, UK
Richard G. Taylor
Richard G. Taylor
Department of Geography, UCL, London, UK
A
Allan Tucker
Department of Computer Science, Brunel University of London, UK