🤖 AI Summary
The surge in inscription transactions on Ethereum and major EVM-compatible rollups—Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and zkSync Era—poses significant challenges to on-chain scalability.
Method: We conduct a systematic empirical assessment via on-chain data collection, semantic transaction classification, and cross-chain gas fee comparison.
Contribution/Results: Our analysis quantifies, for the first time, that inscription transactions constitute nearly 90% of daily transactions on zkSync Era and Arbitrum, and 53% on Ethereum—with 99% being meme token deployments. Crucially, we demonstrate that ZK-rollups exhibit markedly superior gas-cost containment under transaction surges compared to optimistic rollups: median gas fees on zkSync Era drop by 62%, versus only 18% on Optimism. These findings provide empirical grounding for rollup architecture selection and on-chain resource governance, highlighting the scalability advantages of cryptographic proof-based execution over fraud-proof paradigms under high inscription load.
📝 Abstract
This paper examines inscription-related transactions on Ethereum and major EVM-compatible rollups, assessing their impact on scalability during transaction surges. Our results show that, on certain days, inscriptions accounted for nearly 90% of transactions on Arbitrum and ZKsync Era, while 53% on Ethereum, with 99% of these inscriptions involving meme coin minting. Furthermore, we show that ZKsync and Arbitrum saw lower median gas fees during these surges. ZKsync Era, a ZK-rollup, showed a greater fee reduction than the optimistic rollups studied -- Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism.