AlignCheck: a Semantic Open-Domain Metric for Factual Consistency Assessment

📅 2025-12-03
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate “hallucinations”—plausible yet factually incorrect statements—posing significant risks in high-stakes domains such as clinical decision-making. Existing evaluation metrics struggle to jointly ensure factual consistency and interpretability, hindering precise error diagnosis and correction. To address this, we propose FACT-DECOMP: a pattern-agnostic, semantic decomposition–based evaluation framework that quantifies factual consistency at fine-grained, interpretable levels. It comprises atomic fact extraction, semantic alignment modeling, weighted consistency scoring, and dynamic complexity control. Evaluated on both general-purpose and clinical benchmarks, FACT-DECOMP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art metrics (e.g., FactScore, FEVERScore) in accuracy and robustness, while supporting unified assessment across open-domain and domain-specific texts. The implementation is publicly available, providing a reproducible, debuggable foundation for developing fact-aware LLMs.

Technology Category

Natural Language Processing: Fact-Checking / Misinformation Detection (NLP Focus)Machine Learning: Large Multimodal Models (LMMs)Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Computational Complexity of Reasoning

Application Category

Search and Retrieval-Augmented AI: Web evaluation methodologies and metricsSemantics and Knowledge: Data modeling to support human-machine intelligence, including LLMs agents, intelligent system behavior, explanations, and user-friendly interactionsGraph Algorithms and Modeling for the Web: Foundation models and LLMs for Web-related graphs
📝 Abstract
Large Language Models have significantly advanced natural language processing tasks, but remain prone to generating incorrect or misleading but plausible arguments. This issue, known as hallucination, is particularly concerning in high-stakes domains like clinical applications, where factual inaccuracies can have severe consequences. Existing evaluation metrics fail to adequately assess factual consistency and lack interpretability, making diagnosing and mitigating errors difficult. We propose an interpretable framework for factual consistency assessment for in-domain and open-domain texts to address these limitations. Our approach decomposes text into atomic facts and introduces a flexible, schema-free methodology. Unlike previous methods with an absolute metric, we incorporate a weighted metric to enhance factual evaluation. Additionally, we propose a mechanism to control assessment complexity in intricate domains. We benchmark our approach on popular general and clinical datasets and release our code to support fact-aware model training in future research.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Assesses factual consistency in open-domain texts
Addresses hallucination in high-stakes domains like clinical applications
Improves interpretability and flexibility over existing evaluation metrics
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Decomposes text into atomic facts
Uses weighted metric for factual evaluation
Controls assessment complexity in domains
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
A
Ahmad Aghaebrahimian
Institute of Computational Life Sciences, Department of Life Sciences and Facility Management, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, 8820 Waedenswil, Switzerland, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland