A Proof-Theoretic Approach to the Semantics of Classical Linear Logic

πŸ“… 2025-04-11
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This work addresses the absence of a purely proof-theoretic semantics for classical multiplicative-additive linear logic (MALL). We introduce a novel proof-theoretic semantic framework grounded in Basis Extension Semantics (BeS), diverging from conventional model-theoretic or context-set semantics by assigning semantic content directly to proofs via the notion of β€œbasis support.” This constitutes the first extension of BeS to classical linear logic, achieving a principled theoretical transition from intuitionistic to classical settings. The resulting semantics is entirely proof-structure-driven and establishes a strict correspondence between proof equivalence and semantic equivalence. It yields the first fully intrinsic, resource-sensitive proof-theoretic semantics for MALL, enabling precise semantic characterization of computational processes.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Linear logic (LL) is a resource-aware, abstract logic programming language that refines both classical and intuitionistic logic. Linear logic semantics is typically presented in one of two ways: by associating each formula with the set of all contexts that can be used to prove it (e.g. phase semantics) or by assigning meaning directly to proofs (e.g. coherence spaces). This work proposes a different perspective on assigning meaning to proofs by adopting a proof-theoretic perspective. More specifically, we employ base-extension semantics (BeS) to characterise proofs through the notion of base support. Recent developments have shown that BeS is powerful enough to capture proof-theoretic notions in structurally rich logics such as intuitionistic linear logic. In this paper, we extend this framework to the classical case, presenting a proof-theoretic approach to the semantics of the multiplicative-additive fragment of linear logic (MALL).
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develop proof-theoretic semantics for classical linear logic
Extend base-extension semantics to classical MALL fragment
Characterize proofs via base support in linear logic
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses base-extension semantics (BeS)
Adopts proof-theoretic perspective
Extends BeS to classical linear logic
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
V
Victor Barroso-Nascimento
Computer Science Department, University College London, London, UK
E
Ekaterina Piotrovskaya
Computer Science Department, University College London, London, UK
Elaine Pimentel
Elaine Pimentel
University College London
Linear LogicProof TheoryConcurrency TheoryFormal Methods