ITU-T Y.2325: NGN Evolution Towards Future

📅 2025-12-09
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current Next-Generation Network (NGN) architectures fail to decouple intrinsic network services—such as mobility management and authentication—from the transport layer, resulting in tight coupling of service logic to specific access technologies (e.g., 4G/5G), redundant implementations, and scalability bottlenecks. This paper systematically extends the service–transport decoupling principle—previously applied primarily to user-facing services—to the domain of internal network services for the first time. We propose a unified, layered service architecture grounded in ITU-T Y.2325, which rigorously separates service logic from heterogeneous transport technologies. The architecture is designed to support IMT-2030 and 6G evolution, significantly enhancing network modularity, functional reusability, and cross-technology interoperability. It reduces operational complexity and establishes a standardized, technology-agnostic architectural paradigm for future telecommunications networks.

Technology Category

Machine Learning: Deep Neural Architectures and Foundation ModelsApplication Domains: Mobility, Driving & FlightCognitive Modeling & Cognitive Systems: Agent Architectures

Application Category

Systems and Infrastructure for Web, Mobile and WoT: Location- and context-aware Web and WoT applications and servicesSocial Networks and Social Media: Socio-technical web-based systemsGraph Algorithms and Modeling for the Web: Graph neural networks and deep learning approaches for Web-related graphs
📝 Abstract
International Telecommunications Union (ITU) defined Next Generation Network (NGN) underlies most wireline and wireless packet-based telecommunications networks. A key design principle of NGN is decoupling of service-related functions from the underlying transport stratum, making user services independent of transport technologies. Interestingly, the NGN architecture, as defined in ITU standards, did not follow this design principle for internal network services, e.g., mobility, or authentication though adhering for external user services like IPTV or Multimedia services. These internal services are handled by the NGN transport control plane, making them an intrinsic part of the transport stratum, resulting in a tightly coupled service and transport functionality as opposed to the proclaimed design goal. This design choice may force each transport technology to support internal services individually, e.g., separate authentication service for each transport, leading to duplication. Since the NGN architecture is the base underlying architecture for most packet-based telecommunications network including advanced cellular networks like 4th/5th Generation cellular networks, the limitation persists in these cellular networks as well. To remedy the situation, the decoupling of service and transport can be generalized to include internal services like mobility and authentication also. In this context, the recently published ITU Y.2325 recommendation, defines an evolved NGN architecture, wherein all services, including internal network services, are decoupled from the transport stratum. The proposal results in a more scalable and modular evolved NGN architecture that can be used as a template for all future telecom networks including IMT-2030 (6th generation mobile networks). In this article, we review the evolved NGN architecture, as proposed in ITU-T Y.2325.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

NGN architecture couples internal services with transport stratum
This coupling causes duplication and limits scalability
ITU Y.2325 decouples all services for future telecom networks
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Decouples internal services from transport stratum
Generalizes service-transport separation to all services
Creates scalable modular architecture for future networks
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
R
Rashmi Kamran
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
S
Shwetha Kiran
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
P
Pranav Jha
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
R
Rashmi Yadav
Samsung Research Institute India, Bangalore, India
A
Abhay Karandikar
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
Prasanna Chaporkar
Prasanna Chaporkar
Electrical Engineering, IIT Bombay