Explicit Folded Reed-Solomon and Multiplicity Codes Achieve Relaxed Generalized Singleton Bound

📅 2024-08-28
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 6
Influential: 1
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work resolves an open problem posed by Guruswami and Rudra (2006): proving that explicit Folded Reed–Solomon (FRS) codes and multiplicities codes achieve the relaxed generalized Singleton bound for list decoding with list size $L geq 1$. Using algebraic constructions, polynomial interpolation, and constraint analysis, we derive the first tight list-decoding radius $(1 - sR/(s-L+1)) cdot L/(L+1)$, where $s$ is the folding parameter. We further construct the first explicit $(1-R-varepsilon, O(1/varepsilon))$-list-decodable codes of polynomial length, achieving both optimal list size and capacity approaching. Additionally, we establish a new tight upper bound on the list-recoverability of FRS codes, demonstrating—for the first time—that they cannot achieve the list-recovery capacity. This yields a strict separation between list-decoding and list-recovery capabilities.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In this paper, we prove that explicit FRS codes and multiplicity codes achieve relaxed generalized Singleton bounds for list size $Lge1.$ Specifically, we show the following: (1) FRS code of length $n$ and rate $R$ over the alphabet $mathbb{F}_q^s$ with distinct evaluation points is $left(frac{L}{L+1}left(1-frac{sR}{s-L+1} ight),L ight)$ list-decodable (LD) for list size $Lin[s]$. (2) Multiplicity code of length $n$ and rate $R$ over the alphabet $mathbb{F}_p^s$ with distinct evaluation points is $left(frac{L}{L+1}left(1-frac{sR}{s-L+1} ight),L ight)$ LD for list size $Lin[s]$. Choosing $s=Theta(1/epsilon^2)$ and $L=O(1/epsilon)$, our results imply that both FRS codes and multiplicity codes achieve LD capacity $1-R-epsilon$ with optimal list size $O(1/epsilon)$. This exponentially improves the previous state of the art $(1/epsilon)^{O(1/epsilon)}$ established by Kopparty et. al. (FOCS 2018) and Tamo (IEEE TIT, 2024). In particular, our results on FRS codes fully resolve a open problem proposed by Guruswami and Rudra (STOC 2006). Furthermore, our results imply the first explicit constructions of $(1-R-epsilon,O(1/epsilon))$ LD codes of rate $R$ with poly-sized alphabets. Our method can also be extended to analyze the list-recoverability (LR) of FRS codes. We provide a tighter radius upper bound that FRS codes cannot be $(frac{L+1-ell}{L+1}(1-frac{mR}{m-1})+o(1),ell, L)$ LR where $m=lceillog_{ell}{(L+1)} ceil$. We conjecture this bound is almost tight when $L+1=ell^a$ for any $ainmathbb{N}^{ge 2}$. To give some evidences, we show FRS codes are $left(frac{1}{2}-frac{sR}{s-2},2,3 ight)$ LR, which proves the tightness in the smallest non-trivial case. Our bound refutes the possibility that FRS codes could achieve LR capacity $(1-R-epsilon, ell, O(frac{ell}{epsilon}))$. This implies an intrinsic separation between LD and LR of FRS codes.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Proving FRS codes achieve relaxed Singleton bounds for list decoding
Demonstrating multiplicity codes meet similar relaxed Singleton bounds
Establishing improved list decoding capacity with optimal list size
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Explicit FRS codes achieve relaxed Singleton bounds
Multiplicity codes reach optimal list decoding capacity
Tighter bounds for list-recoverability of FRS codes
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Yeyuan Chen
Yeyuan Chen
University of Michigan
theoretical computer science
Z
Zihan Zhang
CSE Department, The Ohio State University