Steering Instruction Hierarchies at Inference Time

📅 2026-07-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the failure of large language models to consistently adhere to hierarchical instruction safety assumptions during inference—specifically, the inability of high-priority instructions (e.g., system prompts) to override conflicting lower-priority content. To resolve this, the authors propose V-Steer, the first training-free, inference-time intervention that leverages logit attribution analysis of the initial token to perform in-place multiplicative editing of cached Value vectors. This approach precisely amplifies the influence of high-priority instructions while suppressing conflicting signals. V-Steer incurs only a one-time prefill overhead, is compatible with fused attention mechanisms, and dramatically improves performance: on role-conflict benchmarks, it elevates primary constraint accuracy from below 18% to 92% across models ranging from 7B to 70B parameters, matching or exceeding state-of-the-art trained methods in three out of four hierarchical instruction-following evaluations.
📝 Abstract
Instruction hierarchies are a core safety assumption of language model deployment: higher priority inputs, such as system prompts, should override conflicting lower priority inputs from users or tools. Yet frontier LLMs often violate this hierarchy. We introduce V-Steer, a training-free inference time method that restores privileged influence by editing cached value vectors at prompt positions. Using direct logit attribution on the first next token prediction, V-Steer identifies heads where lower priority spans dominate privileged ones, then boosts privileged spans and suppresses conflicting lower priority spans through in-place multiplicative edits to cached V tensors. Since the method acts only on cached values, it remains compatible with fused attention backends and adds only a one time prefill overhead. Across models from 7B to 70B, this attribution guided intervention raises primary constraint accuracy from under 18% up to 92% on controlled role conflict benchmarks, and on broader instruction hierarchy evaluations substantially outperforms prompt only baselines while matching or exceeding SoTA training based methods on 3 of 4 scales of LLMs, with negligible decoding-speed overhead. The code is available at https://github.com/cindy2000sh/v-steer.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

instruction hierarchies
language model safety
priority override
LLM alignment
system prompts
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

instruction hierarchies
inference-time intervention
value vector editing
direct logit attribution
training-free steering