🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of defining and evaluating whether deep learning systems genuinely understand the properties of target systems. To this end, the authors develop a formal framework integrating philosophical epistemology with machine learning theory, proposing a “systematic understanding” model: understanding is achieved when an agent possesses an internal model that tracks genuine regularities, is stably coupled to the target system via bridging principles, and supports reliable predictions. Building on this framework, the paper advances the “fragmented understanding hypothesis,” arguing that while current deep learning systems exhibit limited forms of understanding, they fall significantly short of scientific understanding in terms of symbolic alignment, explicit reducibility, and unificatory power—thereby revealing a fundamental gap between artificial and scientific comprehension.
📝 Abstract
I propose a model of systematic understanding, suitable for machine learning systems. On this account, an agent understands a property of a target system when it contains an adequate internal model that tracks real regularities, is coupled to the target by stable bridge principles, and supports reliable prediction. I argue that contemporary deep learning systems often can and do achieve such understanding. However they generally fall short of the ideal of scientific understanding: the understanding is symbolically misaligned with the target system, not explicitly reductive, and only weakly unifying. I label this the Fractured Understanding Hypothesis.