AIS: Adaptive Importance Sampling for Quantized RL

📅 2026-05-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

174K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the instability and potential collapse in training caused by the mismatch between low-precision inference (e.g., FP8) and high-precision training (e.g., BF16), which introduces policy gradient bias. To mitigate this issue, the authors propose Adaptive Importance Sampling (AIS), the first method to incorporate a dynamic mixing coefficient into importance sampling. AIS continuously diagnoses weight reliability, distribution shift, and variance amplification during training to adaptively adjust the strength of gradient correction, thereby suppressing quantization-induced bias while preserving exploration capability. Implemented within the GRPO framework and combining FP8 rollouts with a BF16 trainer, the approach integrates a diagnostic module and an importance-weighted gradient interpolation mechanism. Experiments on LLaMA-8B-Instruct, Qwen3-8B, and Qwen3.5-9B demonstrate that AIS matches the performance of BF16 baselines while achieving 1.5–2.76× speedup in rollouts.
📝 Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs) is dominated by the cost of rollout generation, which has motivated the use of low-precision rollouts (e.g., FP8) paired with a BF16 trainer to improve throughput and reduce memory pressure. This introduces a rollout-training mismatch that biases the policy gradient and can cause training to collapse outright on reasoning benchmarks. We show that the mismatch is non-stationary and acts as a double-edged sword: early in training it provides a stochastic exploration bonus, exposing the gradient to trajectories the trainer would otherwise under-sample, but the same perturbation transitions into a destabilizing source of bias as the policy concentrates. To solve this, we propose Adaptive Importance Sampling (AIS), a correction framework that adjusts the strength of its intervention on a per-batch basis. AIS combines three real-time diagnostics, namely weight reliability, divergence severity, and variance amplification, into a single mixing coefficient that interpolates between the uncorrected and fully importance-weighted gradients, suppressing the destabilizing component of the mismatch while preserving its exploratory benefit. We integrate AIS into GRPO and evaluate it on the diffusion-based LLaDA-8B-Instruct and the autoregressive Qwen3-8B and Qwen3.5-9B across mathematical reasoning and planning benchmarks. AIS matches the BF16 baseline on most tasks while retaining the 1.5 to 2.76x rollout speedup of FP8.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

quantized reinforcement learning
rollout-training mismatch
policy gradient bias
low-precision rollouts
training instability
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Adaptive Importance Sampling
Quantized Reinforcement Learning
Rollout-Training Mismatch
Low-Precision Rollouts
Policy Gradient Correction
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.