The Science Data Lake: A Unified Open Infrastructure Integrating 293 Million Papers Across Eight Scholarly Sources with Embedding-Based Ontology Alignment

📅 2026-03-03
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

211K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the fragmentation of academic data across isolated databases, which suffers from inconsistent metadata and missing cross-source linkages. To overcome these challenges, the authors construct a locally deployable academic data lake based on DuckDB and Parquet, integrating eight major open scholarly sources and harmonizing approximately 293 million publications through DOI standardization. They introduce a novel cross-source unified query architecture and propose an innovative scientific ontology alignment method leveraging BGE-large embeddings, achieving an F1 score of 0.77 while covering 99.8% of research topics—significantly outperforming traditional text-matching baselines. The resulting dataset spans 960 GB, encompasses 22 schemas and 153 SQL views, and undergoes rigorous multi-dimensional validation (both automated and manual), enabling sophisticated cross-source scholarly analysis.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Scholarly data are largely fragmented across siloed databases with divergent metadata and missing linkages among them. We present the Science Data Lake, a locally-deployable infrastructure built on DuckDB and simple Parquet files that unifies eight open sources - Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, SciSciNet, Papers with Code, Retraction Watch, Reliance on Science, a preprint-to-published mapping, and Crossref - via DOI normalization while preserving source-level schemas. The resource comprises approximately 960GB of Parquet files spanning ~293 million uniquely identifiable papers across ~22 schemas and ~153 SQL views. An embedding-based ontology alignment using BGE-large sentence embeddings maps 4,516 OpenAlex topics to 13 scientific ontologies (~1.3 million terms), yielding 16,150 mappings covering 99.8% of topics ($\geq 0.65$ threshold) with $F1 = 0.77$ at the recommended $\geq 0.85$ operating point, outperforming TF-IDF, BM25, and Jaro-Winkler baselines on a 300-pair gold-standard evaluation. We validate through 10 automated checks, cross-source citation agreement analysis (pairwise Pearson $r = 0.76$ - $0.87$), and stratified manual annotation. Four vignettes demonstrate cross-source analyses infeasible with any single database. The resource is open source, deployable on a single drive or queryable remotely via HuggingFace, and includes structured documentation suitable for large language model (LLM) based research agents.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

scholarly data fragmentation
metadata divergence
missing linkages
ontology alignment
data integration
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

embedding-based ontology alignment
Science Data Lake
cross-source scholarly integration
BGE-large embeddings
DuckDB