🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates how user migration from banned communities on mainstream platforms (e.g., Reddit) to alternative platforms (e.g., Voat) reshapes community structure and toxicity dynamics. Employing cross-platform user tracking, multilayer network analysis, fine-grained toxicity detection, and dynamic reputation modeling, we uncover a two-stage, periphery-driven migration process—early “hostile takeover” followed by “toxicity equilibration”—refuting the “hub capture” hypothesis. Contrary to expectations, low-centrality newcomers—not central users—drive toxicity amplification. We further find that loosely connected groups dilute toxicity, whereas ideologically cohesive clusters form localized toxicity enclaves. Crucially, we identify the initial hostile takeover phase as a critical intervention window for receiving platforms. Our work contributes a structural-aware framework for toxicity mitigation, grounded in empirical evidence of migration-induced network reconfiguration and behavioral contagion. (149 words)
📝 Abstract
Deplatforming, the permanent banning of entire communities, is a primary tool for content moderation on mainstream platforms. While prior research examines effects on banned communities or source platform health, the impact on alternative platforms that absorb displaced users remains understudied. We analyze four major Reddit ban waves (2015--2020) and their effects on generalist communities on Voat, asking how post-ban arrivals reshape community structure and through what mechanisms transformation occurs. Combining network analysis, toxicity detection, and dynamic reputation modeling, we identify two distinct regimes of migration impact: (1) Hostile Takeover (2015--2018), where post-ban arrival cohorts formed parallel social structures that bypassed existing community cores through sheer volume, and (2) Toxic Equilibrium (2018--2020), where the flattening of existing user hierarchy enabled newcomers to integrate into the now-dominant toxic community. Crucially, community transformation occurred through peripheral dynamics rather than hub capture: fewer than 5% of newcomers achieved central positions in most months, yet toxicity doubled. Migration structure also shaped outcomes: loosely organized communities dispersed into generalist spaces, while ideologically cohesive groups concentrated in dedicated enclaves. These findings suggest that receiving platforms face a narrow intervention window during the hostile takeover phase, after which toxic norms become self-sustaining.