HyperFitS -- Hypernetwork Fitting Spectra for metabolic quantification of ${}^1$H MR spectroscopic imaging

πŸ“… 2026-04-03
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the challenges of time-consuming metabolite quantification in ΒΉH magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and the limited parameter adaptability of existing deep learning approaches. To overcome these issues, the authors propose HyperFitS, a hypernetwork-based spectral fitting method that, for the first time, integrates hypernetworks into MRSI metabolite quantification. HyperFitS flexibly adapts to varying baseline correction strategies, water suppression states, field strengths (3T/7T), and spatial resolutions (2–10 mm) without requiring retraining. Experimental results demonstrate that HyperFitS achieves whole-brain metabolite quantification within seconds, with outputs highly consistent with the LCModel gold standard. The study further reveals that baseline parameterization can influence quantification results by up to 30%, underscoring the method’s enhanced generalizability and computational efficiency.
πŸ“ Abstract
Purpose: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ($^1$H MRSI) enables the mapping of whole-brain metabolites concentrations in-vivo. However, a long-standing problem for its clinical applicability is the metabolic quantification, which can require extensive time for spectral fitting. Recently, deep learning methods have been able to provide whole-brain metabolic quantification in only a few seconds. However, neural network implementations often lack configurability and require retraining to change predefined parameter settings. Methods: We introduce HyperFitS, a hypernetwork for spectral fitting for metabolite quantification in whole-brain $^1$H MRSI that flexibly adapts to a broad range of baseline corrections and water suppression factors. Metabolite maps of human subjects acquired at 3T and 7T with isotropic resolutions of 10 mm, 3.4 mm and 2 mm by water-suppressed and water-unsuppressed MRSI were quantified with HyperFitS and compared to conventional LCModel fitting. Results: Metabolic maps show a substantial agreement between the new and gold-standard methods, with significantly faster fitting times by HyperFitS. Quantitative results further highlight the impact of baseline parametrization on metabolic quantification, which can alter results by up to 30%. Conclusion: HyperFitS shows strong agreement with state-of-the-art conventional methods, while reducing processing times from hours to a few seconds. Compared to prior deep learning based spectral fitting methods, HyperFitS enables a wide range of configurability and can adapt to data quality acquired with multiple protocols and field strengths without retraining.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

metabolic quantification
ΒΉH MRSI
spectral fitting
deep learning
configurability
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

hypernetwork
spectral fitting
metabolic quantification
MRSI
configurable deep learning
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
P
Paul J. Weiser
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Computational Imaging Research Lab – Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
G
Gulnur Ungan
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
A
Amirmohammad Shamaei
Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Georg Langs
Georg Langs
Medical University of Vienna, CIR Lab
Machine Learning in NeuroImagingFunctional Connectivity
W
Wolfgang Bogner
High Field MR Center – Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
M
Malte Hoffmann
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
A
Antoine Klauser
Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthineers International AG, Lausanne, Switzerland
O
Ovidiu C. Andronesi
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA