Tight UGC Thresholds for Geometric Stabbing Problems

📅 2026-07-30
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work establishes tight approximation thresholds for several geometric piercing problems under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC). Focusing on three specific settings—axis-aligned cubes, horizontal line segments, and separated $d$-intervals—the authors construct integrality gap instances for the corresponding covering linear programs. By integrating the strict-CSP framework, randomized rounding, and full-support perturbation techniques, together with a novel analysis based on continuous trace structures, they derive the first UGC-based hardness results that match the performance of the best-known approximation algorithms. Specifically, they show that the UGC-hardness thresholds are $d$ for piercing $d$-dimensional axis-aligned cubes, $e/(e-1)$ for horizontal line segments, and $d$ for hitting sets of separated $d$-intervals. This provides a sharp complexity characterization for these fundamental geometric covering problems.
📝 Abstract
Many geometric stabbing problems admit natural covering LPs in which each constraint is a union of consecutive traces on ordered candidate sets. We prove a transfer theorem showing that every fixed finite, bounded-arity integrality-gap instance of this form yields a matching hardness ratio under the Unique Games Conjecture. Using the strict-CSP framework of Kumar, Manokaran, Tulsiani, and Vishnoi [SODA 2011], we construct the required connected local distributions by randomized rounding and a full-support perturbation. Given a fractional vector $x$ on a block, the rounding selects candidate $i$ with marginal probability $x_i$ and hits each consecutive trace $T$ with probability $\min\{1,x(T)\}$. We obtain three tight UGC thresholds. First, for every fixed $d\ge 2$, stabbing arbitrary-size axis-parallel $d$-cubes with coordinate hyperplanes has threshold $d$. For $d=2$, the hardness holds for arbitrary-size squares and establishes threshold $2$ for rectangle and square stabbing, matching the $2$-approximation of Gaur, Ibaraki, and Krishnamurti [ESA 2000]. Second, stabbing horizontal segments with horizontal and vertical lines has threshold $e/(e-1)$, matching the $e/(e-1)$-approximation of Kovaleva and Spieksma [ESA 2004]. Third, separated $d$-interval transversal has threshold $d$ for every fixed $d\ge 2$, closing under UGC the gap left by the $d$-approximation of Ben-David, Grant, Ma, and Sharpe [CCCG 2012].
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

geometric stabbing
UGC hardness
integrality gap
approximation threshold
covering LP
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Unique Games Conjecture
geometric stabbing
integrality gap
randomized rounding
approximation threshold
🔎 Similar Papers
2023-03-14International Symposium on Computational GeometryCitations: 5