Unified Attacks to Large Language Model Watermarks: Spoofing and Scrubbing in Unauthorized Knowledge Distillation

📅 2025-04-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

164K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the insufficient robustness of large language model (LLM) watermarking against unauthorized knowledge distillation—where existing attacks either require white-box access or fail to simultaneously achieve watermark removal and forgery. We propose CDG-KD, the first black-box, unified bidirectional attack framework that requires no internal model access. Leveraging a newly discovered “watermark radioactivity” phenomenon—i.e., the propagation and amplification of watermark signals during distillation—we design a contrastive decoding guidance mechanism to jointly model watermark erasure and adversarial watermark forging. Extensive experiments across multiple LLMs and watermarking schemes demonstrate: >92% watermark removal rate, >89% successful forgery rate, and <1.5% degradation in distilled models’ general-purpose performance. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic study to characterize and exploit watermark propagation dynamics in knowledge distillation, establishing a new evaluation paradigm and a strong baseline for assessing LLM watermark security.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Watermarking has emerged as a critical technique for combating misinformation and protecting intellectual property in large language models (LLMs). A recent discovery, termed watermark radioactivity, reveals that watermarks embedded in teacher models can be inherited by student models through knowledge distillation. On the positive side, this inheritance allows for the detection of unauthorized knowledge distillation by identifying watermark traces in student models. However, the robustness of watermarks against scrubbing attacks and their unforgeability in the face of spoofing attacks under unauthorized knowledge distillation remain largely unexplored. Existing watermark attack methods either assume access to model internals or fail to simultaneously support both scrubbing and spoofing attacks. In this work, we propose Contrastive Decoding-Guided Knowledge Distillation (CDG-KD), a unified framework that enables bidirectional attacks under unauthorized knowledge distillation. Our approach employs contrastive decoding to extract corrupted or amplified watermark texts via comparing outputs from the student model and weakly watermarked references, followed by bidirectional distillation to train new student models capable of watermark removal and watermark forgery, respectively. Extensive experiments show that CDG-KD effectively performs attacks while preserving the general performance of the distilled model. Our findings underscore critical need for developing watermarking schemes that are robust and unforgeable.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Assessing watermark robustness against scrubbing attacks
Evaluating watermark unforgeability under spoofing attacks
Developing unified framework for bidirectional watermark attacks
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Contrastive decoding extracts watermark texts
Bidirectional distillation trains student models
CDG-KD framework enables unified watermark attacks
X
Xin Yi
Lab of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; Shanghai Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Shunfan Zheng
Shunfan Zheng
Master student, East China Normal University
Natural language processingLarge Language Models
L
Linlin Wang
Lab of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; Shanghai Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
X
Xiaoling Wang
Lab of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; Shanghai Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
L
Liang He
Lab of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; Shanghai Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China