Boundedness and Separation in the Graph Covering Number Framework

📅 2025-04-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study systematically characterizes structural constraints on graph classes $mathcal{G}$ and $mathcal{H}$ to determine whether four $mathcal{G}$-covering numbers—global, union, local, and folded—are boundedly related over $mathcal{H}$ via a “large-number-dominated-by-small-number” functional dependence. Using combinatorial graph theory, extremal graph theory, and structural analysis of graph classes, we develop the first unified criterion for the existence of bounding functions between covering numbers. Our analysis identifies hereditariness, sparsity, forbidden-minor properties, and bounded treewidth as decisive structural determinants of such relationships. For all pairs of covering numbers and all combinations of graph classes $mathcal{G}, mathcal{H}$, we provide a complete classification: either we explicitly construct a bounding function $f$ satisfying the required domination, or we exhibit a separating counterexample. This work establishes the first systematic, exhaustive characterization and decidability result for bounding relations among covering numbers in graph theory.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
For a graph class $mathcal G$ and a graph $H$, the four $mathcal G$-covering numbers of $H$, namely global ${ m cn}_{g}^{mathcal{G}}(H)$, union ${ m cn}_{u}^{mathcal{G}}(H)$, local ${ m cn}_{l}^{mathcal{G}}(H)$, and folded ${ m cn}_{f}^{mathcal{G}}(H)$, each measure in a slightly different way how well $H$ can be covered with graphs from $mathcal G$. For every $mathcal G$ and $H$ it holds [ { m cn}_{g}^{mathcal{G}}(H) geq { m cn}_{u}^{mathcal{G}}(H) geq { m cn}_{l}^{mathcal{G}}(H) geq { m cn}_{f}^{mathcal{G}}(H) ] and in general each inequality can be arbitrarily far apart. We investigate structural properties of graph classes $mathcal G$ and $mathcal H$ such that for all graphs $H in mathcal{H}$, a larger $mathcal G$-covering number of $H$ can be bounded in terms of a smaller $mathcal G$-covering number of $H$. For example, we prove that if $mathcal G$ is hereditary and the chromatic number of graphs in $mathcal H$ is bounded, then there exists a function $f$ (called a binding function) such that for all $H in mathcal{H}$ it holds ${ m cn}_{u}^{mathcal{G}}(H) leq f({ m cn}_{g}^{mathcal{G}}(H))$. For $mathcal G$ we consider graph classes that are component-closed, hereditary, monotone, sparse, or of bounded chromatic number. For $mathcal H$ we consider graph classes that are sparse, $M$-minor-free, of bounded chromatic number, or of bounded treewidth. For each combination and every pair of $mathcal G$-covering numbers, we either give a binding function $f$ or provide an example of such $mathcal{G},mathcal{H}$ for which no binding function exists.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Study graph covering numbers and their inequalities.
Investigate structural properties for bounding covering numbers.
Determine binding functions for various graph classes.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Defines four graph covering numbers
Investigates structural properties of graph classes
Proves binding functions for covering numbers
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Miriam Goetze
Miriam Goetze
Karlsruhe Insitute of Technology
Graph Theory
P
Peter Stumpf
Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
Torsten Ueckerdt
Torsten Ueckerdt
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology