🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the sensitivity of machine learning–based weather forecasting models to scale-aware scoring rules and their performance variations across different regions and spatial scales. Building upon the AIFS-CRPS framework, we present the first systematic evaluation of multivariate scale-aware loss functions—including the fair Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS), global energy score, and graph energy score—for global probabilistic forecasting. Through spectral analysis, we elucidate how these losses influence the spectral structure of forecast fields. Our experiments demonstrate that explicitly incorporating scale-aware losses significantly enhances the realism of predicted atmospheric fields. Notably, the graph energy score yields optimal performance in tropical regions, whereas the global energy score exhibits slight degradation, thereby confirming the efficacy and potential of multivariate scoring rules in advancing machine learning–driven weather prediction.
📝 Abstract
Probabilistic forecast models can be machine-learned from data using loss functions based on scoring rules such as the Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS). This note summarises a preliminary study comparing versions of AIFS-CRPS, a global weather forecast model, trained with different univariate and multivariate scoring rules that aim to explicitly represent scale-awareness in the loss function. In the first part, we compare the (almost) fair CRPS, a fair global energy score, and a graph energy score based on node neighbourhoods. Across standard verification metrics, forecast skill is broadly similar. In the extratropics we find only small differences, while in the tropics the graph energy score setup performs somewhat better and the global energy score shows some degradation. These results suggest that multivariate scores are a viable alternative to CRPS-based training for global machine-learned weather forecasting. In the second part of the study, we analyse how different scoring rules and scale-aware loss constraints shape the spectra of forecast fields. It is apparent that any form of explicit scale-awareness improves realism. Here, the largest differences are likely associated with different effective weights per scale.