RadPRISM: Schema-stratified radiology-report supervision for concept-disentangled image representations and visual grounding

📅 2026-07-31
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limitations of existing medical vision–language pretraining models, which suffer from ambiguous clinical concept representation and poor interpretability due to learning in a single shared embedding space. The authors propose the first approach that explicitly leverages the hierarchical structure of clinical radiology concepts as an inductive axis for representation learning. By employing a local large language model to extract concept-level text fragments from radiology reports, they construct dedicated visual subspaces for each clinical concept, enabling natively disentangled, interpretable, and spatially precise alignment. This framework supports fine-grained visual grounding and retrieval, achieving a zero-shot classification macro AUROC of 0.868 (+0.151) on an internal dataset, 4.3× higher visual grounding performance than CARZero in external evaluation, and a top-3 concept retrieval accuracy of 0.78 as assessed by radiologists.
📝 Abstract
Vision-language pretraining learns rich medical image representations from radiology reports, but previous model variants commonly operate within a single shared embedding space, so concept-level structure and interpretability must be recovered post hoc, limiting model transparency and, hence, clinical utility. We introduce RadPRISM, which makes a clinician-defined radiology schema a designated stratification axis: an on-premise large language model extracts per-concept text spans from free-text reports, and each clinical concept is aligned in its own dedicated visual subspace, turning concept stratification into direct, top-level alignment supervision. Instantiated on chest radiographs with a 19-concept schema over $203{,}602$ examinations from an internal multi-year archive, RadPRISM improved internal dataset zero-shot classification from $0.717$ (95% CI, $0.710-0.723$) to $0.868$ (95% CI, $0.863-0.872$) macro AUROC over a matched global-alignment baseline, performed on par with the purpose-built CARZero reference in external zero-shot classification while substantially outperforming it (up to 4.3-fold) in pointing-game visual grounding. In addition, a radiologist reader study demonstrated concept-stratified retrieval ability ($0.78$ macro retrieval correctness rate within rank 3), surfacing disentangled descriptive findings that report-level retrieval and fixed-label vocabularies cannot express. RadPRISM yields discriminative, spatially faithful, natively concept-stratified representations shaped by and transparently inspectable by clinicians.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

vision-language pretraining
concept disentanglement
radiology reports
model interpretability
visual grounding
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

concept-disentangled representations
schema-stratified supervision
visual grounding
vision-language pretraining
radiology report parsing
F
Fabian Drexel
Chair for AI in Healthcare and Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM) and TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
M
Marlene Fritzsche
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
E
Era Stambollxhiu
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
M
Miriam Kumpf
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
L
Lena Schmitzer
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
L
Lea Schumann
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
J
Jannik Kahmann
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
F
Friedrich Puttkammer
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany; Department of Radiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Johannes Moll
Johannes Moll
Technical University of Munich, Stanford University
J
Jannik Lübberstedt
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
Z
Zeineb Ben Chaaben
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
A
Anirudh Narayanan
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany; Department of Radiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Cosmin I. Bercea
Cosmin I. Bercea
Technical University of Munich
Computer VisionMultimodal LearningGenerative AIAnomaly DetectionMedical Image Analysis
S
Sebastian Ziegelmayer
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
M
Marcus R. Makowski
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
Daniel Rueckert
Daniel Rueckert
Technical University of Munich and Imperial College London
Machine LearningMedical Image ComputingBiomedical Image AnalysisComputer Vision
L
Lisa C. Adams
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany
K
Keno K. Bressem
Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany; Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany; Institute of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany