A Master Class on Reproducibility: A Student Hackathon on Advanced MRI Reconstruction Methods

📅 2026-01-26
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the reproducibility challenges in MRI reconstruction research by systematically reimplementing three representative methods—MoDL (Model-based Deep Learning), HUMUS-Net (a CNN–Transformer hybrid architecture), and a training-free physics-regularized approach for dynamic MRI—through an educational hackathon framework. By establishing a unified reproducibility pipeline, the work identifies critical implementation barriers and proposes a general reproducibility protocol alongside standardized coding practices. The project not only successfully replicates the core results of the original studies but also yields a transferable best-practice guide for reproducible research in medical imaging AI, offering methodological support to the broader community.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We report the design, protocol, and outcomes of a student reproducibility hackathon focused on replicating the results of three influential MRI reconstruction papers: (a) MoDL, an unrolled model-based network with learned denoising; (b) HUMUS-Net, a hybrid unrolled multiscale CNN+Transformer architecture; and (c) an untrained, physics-regularized dynamic MRI method that uses a quantitative MR model for early stopping. We describe the setup of the hackathon and present reproduction outcomes alongside additional experiments, and we detail fundamental practices for building reproducible codebases.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

reproducibility
MRI reconstruction
scientific replication
computational imaging
open science
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

reproducibility
MRI reconstruction
hackathon
unrolled networks
physics-informed learning
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
L
Lina Felsner
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Germany; Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Germany
S
S. Kafali
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
Hannah Eichhorn
Hannah Eichhorn
PhD candidate, Helmholtz Munich
Magnetic resonance Imagingdeep learningimage reconstruction
A
Agnes A. J. Leth
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
A
Aidas Batvinskas
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
A
André Datchev
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
F
Fabian Klemm
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
J
Jan Aulich
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
P
Puntika Leepagorn
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
R
Ruben Klinger
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
D
D. Rueckert
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Germany; School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Germany; Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK
J
Julia A. Schnabel
School of Computation, Information & Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Germany; Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Germany; School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, UK