Interactive Evidence Maps for Visualizing and Understanding Systematic Reviews

📅 2026-03-27
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

175K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the tendency of systematic reviews to overgeneralize by overlooking fine-grained characteristics of included studies, thereby obscuring inter-study relationships and gaps in the literature. To mitigate this limitation, the authors propose an interactive evidence mapping approach that integrates large language models, topic modeling, and visualization techniques to automatically extract themes from heterogeneous review data and construct a dynamically explorable knowledge map. Validation through a scoping review on pedagogical agents in K–12 education demonstrates that this method transcends the constraints of traditional static summaries, substantially enhancing review transparency, effectively uncovering latent patterns and research gaps, and strengthening exploratory analytical capabilities.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Systematic reviews provide comprehensive syntheses of research fields. As a result, systematic reviews often emphasize synthesizing across the large bodies of literature rather than just describing the studies from which the conclusions were drawn. This risks an incomplete description of the sample - encouraging overgeneralization of the findings, obscuring connections between existing work, or overshadowing gaps in the literature. To address this challenge, we introduce interactive evidence maps; an accessible visualization tool that enables researchers to explore, filter, and analyze review data dynamically. Our approach leverages large language models to extract topic models that structure heterogeneous review data into an interactive, explorable knowledge map that supports deeper inspection beyond static tables and figures. We demonstrate the usefulness of interactive evidence maps using data from a published scoping review of pedagogical agents in K-12 education, and compare the results of the evidence map to those reported in the scoping review. Results show that interactive evidence maps complement traditional syntheses by enhancing transparency, supporting exploratory analysis, and revealing patterns and gaps that may not be easy to detect through narrative summaries alone.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

systematic reviews
evidence synthesis
research gaps
overgeneralization
literature visualization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

interactive evidence maps
large language models
topic modeling
systematic reviews
knowledge visualization
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Aditi Mallavarapu
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
R
Rohan Khandare
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
M
Mokshagna Kadiyala
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
N
Neelesh Yaddanapudi
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Noah L. Schroeder
Noah L. Schroeder
University of Florida
Pedagogical agentsmultimedia learningmeta-analysisvirtual humanssocially interactive agents
S
Shan Zhang
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611
J
Jessica R. Gladstone
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61820