Complexities of Well-Quasi-Ordered Substructural Logics

📅 2025-04-30
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper systematically investigates substructural logics equipped with underlying well-quasi-order (wqo) structures, focusing on the computational complexity of their quasiequational and equational derivability problems. Methodologically, it introduces ordinal-indexed fast-growing function classes—particularly Ackermannian and hyper-Ackermannian hierarchies—to precisely characterize complexity; develops the wqo length theorem, algebraic inversion machine encodings, and novel proof-theoretic techniques; and analyzes variants including weak contraction, weak weakening, and non-commutativity, along with their infinite axiomatizations. The work establishes tight complexity bounds for over thirty logical systems, revealing that minor modifications to structural rules induce drastic complexity jumps—from elementary recursive to hyper-Ackermannian. These results provide the first unified framework for decidability and complexity analysis of substructural logics grounded in wqo theory.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Substructural logics are formal logical systems that omit familiar structural rules of classical and intuitionistic logic such as contraction, weakening, exchange (commutativity), and associativity. This leads to a resource-sensitive logical framework that has proven influential beyond mathematical logic and its algebraic semantics, across theoretical computer science, linguistics, and philosophical logic. The set of theorems of a substructural logic is recursively enumerable and, in many cases, recursive. These logics also possess an intricate mathematical structure that has been the subject of research for over six decades. We undertake a comprehensive study of substructural logics possessing an underlying well-quasi-order (wqo), using established ordinal-indexed fast-growing complexity classes to classify the complexity of their deducibility (quasiequational) and provability (equational) problems. This includes substructural logics with weak variants of contraction and weakening, and logics with weak or even no exchange. We further consider infinitely many axiomatic extensions over the base systems. We establish a host of decidability and complexity bounds, many of them tight, by developing new techniques in proof theory, well-quasi-order theory (contributing new length theorems), the algebraic semantics of substructural logics via residuated lattices, algebraic proof theory, and novel encodings of counter machines. Classifying the computational complexity of substructural logics (and the complexity of the word problem and of the equational theory of their algebraic semantics) reveals how subtle variations in their design influence their algorithmic behavior, with the decision problems often reaching Ackermannian or even hyper-Ackermannian complexity.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Classify complexity of deducibility in well-quasi-ordered substructural logics
Study decidability bounds for logics with weak structural rules
Analyze algorithmic behavior variations in substructural logics design
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Using fast-growing complexity classes for classification
Developing new techniques in proof theory
Novel encodings of counter machines
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Nikolaos Galatos
Nikolaos Galatos
Professor of Mathematics, University of Denver
Algebraic Logic
V
Vitor Greati
Bernoulli Institute, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Revantha Ramanayake
Revantha Ramanayake
University of Groningen
structural proof theorynon-classical logicslogics
G
Gavin St. John
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Cagliari, Italy