How AI Generates Creativity from Inauthenticity

2025-05-16

AI Summary

This paper challenges the conventional view that generative AI’s “inauthenticity” constitutes a deficit, arguing instead that it forms the structural foundation of its artistic creativity. Method: Drawing on philosophical analysis, art phenomenology, and computational modeling of human–AI improvisational music collaboration, the study identifies two constitutive features—“irretraceability” (the irreducibility of generative origins) and “reflexivity” (the system’s dynamic self-referential feedback during generation)—to reframe the ontological premises of AI art. It critically engages Walter Benjamin’s aura-based theory of authenticity. Contribution/Results: The findings demonstrate that inauthenticity does not merely expand creative boundaries but actively advances artistic democratization and identity fluidity. Moreover, it provokes a fundamental re-examination of experiential authenticity and the epistemic grounds of selfhood, positioning generative AI not as a mimetic substitute but as a catalyst for reconfiguring aesthetic agency and human subjectivity.

Technology Category

Philosophy and Ethics of AI: Artificial General IntelligenceCognitive Modeling & Cognitive Systems: Computational CreativityHumans and AI: Other Foundations of Human Computation & AI

Application Category

Social Networks and Social Media: Generative AI / large language models and their impact on social systemsEconomics, Online Markets and Human Computation: Economic ramifications for generative AI infrastructure and applicationsWeb Mining and Content Analysis: Web data provenance, reliability, and authenticity

Abstract

Artificial creativity is presented as a counter to Benjamin's conception of an"aura"in art. Where Benjamin sees authenticity as art's critical element, generative artificial intelligence operates as pure inauthenticity. Two elements of purely inauthentic art are described: elusiveness and reflection. Elusiveness is the inability to find an origin-story for the created artwork, and reflection is the ability for perceivers to impose any origin that serves their own purposes. The paper subsequently argues that these elements widen the scope of artistic and creative potential. To illustrate, an example is developed around musical improvisation with an artificial intelligence partner. Finally, a question is raised about whether the inauthentic creativity of AI in art can be extended to human experience and our sense of our identities.

Problem

• AI challenges authenticity as art's critical element
• Explores elusiveness and reflection in AI-generated art
• Questions AI's inauthentic creativity impact on human identity

Innovation

• Generative AI operates as pure inauthenticity
• Elusiveness and reflection define AI art
• AI musical improvisation demonstrates creative potential