On the Interconnections of Calibration, Quantification, and Classifier Accuracy Prediction under Dataset Shift

📅 2025-05-16
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates the intrinsic relationships among classifier calibration, confidence quantification, and accuracy prediction under data distribution shift. Theoretically, we establish—for the first time—the computational equivalence of these three tasks, proving their mutual reducibility. Methodologically, we develop a unified cross-task adaptation framework grounded in this reducibility, systematically reusing and enhancing classical algorithms—including Platt scaling, expectation-maximization–based confidence quantification, and accuracy regression. Empirically, our general-purpose approach achieves performance on par with or superior to task-specific methods across multiple distribution-shift benchmarks (e.g., ImageNet-C, CIFAR-10-C). By unifying previously disjoint objectives, this work bridges longstanding task boundaries, offering both a coherent theoretical foundation and a practical, implementation-ready methodology for building distribution-shift-robust predictive models.

Technology Category

Machine Learning: Calibration & Uncertainty QuantificationComputer Vision: Adversarial Attacks & RobustnessReasoning under Uncertainty: Relational Probabilistic Models

Application Category

Search and Retrieval-Augmented AI: Web learning to rank, online learning, and counterfactual learning for rankingWeb Mining and Content Analysis: Robustness and generalizability of Web mining methodsEconomics, Online Markets and Human Computation: Trust and reliance of crowd workers and data experts on GenAI
📝 Abstract
When the distribution of the data used to train a classifier differs from that of the test data, i.e., under dataset shift, well-established routines for calibrating the decision scores of the classifier, estimating the proportion of positives in a test sample, or estimating the accuracy of the classifier, become particularly challenging. This paper investigates the interconnections among three fundamental problems, calibration, quantification, and classifier accuracy prediction, under dataset shift conditions. Specifically, we prove their equivalence through mutual reduction, i.e., we show that access to an oracle for any one of these tasks enables the resolution of the other two. Based on these proofs, we propose new methods for each problem based on direct adaptations of well-established methods borrowed from the other disciplines. Our results show such methods are often competitive, and sometimes even surpass the performance of dedicated approaches from each discipline. The main goal of this paper is to fostering cross-fertilization among these research areas, encouraging the development of unified approaches and promoting synergies across the fields.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Investigates calibration, quantification, and accuracy prediction under dataset shift
Proves equivalence of these tasks via mutual reduction under shift conditions
Proposes cross-disciplinary methods to unify approaches for these problems
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Proves equivalence of calibration, quantification, accuracy prediction
Proposes cross-disciplinary method adaptations for dataset shift
Encourages unified approaches through mutual task reduction
🔎 Similar Papers
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
A
Alejandro Moreo
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’Informazione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche