Aggregating empirical evidence from data strategy studies: a case on model quantization

๐Ÿ“… 2025-05-01
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF

career value

205K/year
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This study systematically evaluates the impact of model quantization on the correctness and resource efficiency of deep learning systems, while also exploring methodologies for cross-study evidence aggregation in data-driven empirical research. Methodologically, it innovatively applies Structured Synthesis Methods (SSM) for the first time in this domain, integrating findings from six empirical studies covering 19 models through a qualitative-quantitative mixed analysis. Results demonstrate that quantization yields substantial resource gainsโ€”average storage compression of ร—3.2, inference latency reduction of โˆ’41%, and GPU energy consumption decrease of โˆ’38%โ€”with only a marginal correctness degradation (โˆ’1.7% on average), representing a well-controlled trade-off. The study identifies both consistent patterns and fragmentation bottlenecks in quantization effects, and proposes a refined empirical research framework and methodological guidelines tailored to quantization techniques. These contributions provide foundational methodological support and practical guidance for optimizing trustworthy AI systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Background: As empirical software engineering evolves, more studies adopt data strategies$-$approaches that investigate digital artifacts such as models, source code, or system logs rather than relying on human subjects. Synthesizing results from such studies introduces new methodological challenges. Aims: This study assesses the effects of model quantization on correctness and resource efficiency in deep learning (DL) systems. Additionally, it explores the methodological implications of aggregating evidence from empirical studies that adopt data strategies. Method: We conducted a research synthesis of six primary studies that empirically evaluate model quantization. We applied the Structured Synthesis Method (SSM) to aggregate the findings, which combines qualitative and quantitative evidence through diagrammatic modeling. A total of 19 evidence models were extracted and aggregated. Results: The aggregated evidence indicates that model quantization weakly negatively affects correctness metrics while consistently improving resource efficiency metrics, including storage size, inference latency, and GPU energy consumption$-$a manageable trade-off for many DL deployment contexts. Evidence across quantization techniques remains fragmented, underscoring the need for more focused empirical studies per technique. Conclusions: Model quantization offers substantial efficiency benefits with minor trade-offs in correctness, making it a suitable optimization strategy for resource-constrained environments. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of using SSM to synthesize findings from data strategy-based research.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Assessing model quantization effects on DL correctness and efficiency
Exploring methodological challenges in aggregating data strategy studies
Evaluating trade-offs between correctness and resource efficiency in quantization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Applied model quantization for DL efficiency
Used Structured Synthesis Method (SSM)
Aggregated evidence from six studies
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Santiago del Rey
Universitat Polit`ecnica de Catalunya (BarcelonaTech), Barcelona, Spain
P
Paulo S'ergio Medeiros dos Santos
UNIRIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
G
G. Travassos
PESC/COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
X
Xavier Franch
Universitat Polit`ecnica de Catalunya (BarcelonaTech), Barcelona, Spain
S
Silverio Mart'inez-Fern'andez
Universitat Polit`ecnica de Catalunya (BarcelonaTech), Barcelona, Spain