CBCT-IQ: A Publicly Available Annotated Cone-Beam CT Dataset for Image Quality Assessment and Benchmarking

📅 2026-07-31
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of publicly available, expert-annotated datasets that has hindered research on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality assessment (IQA). To bridge this gap, we introduce CBCT-IQA, the first open-access dataset comprising 1,764 image slices systematically generated by varying acquisition and reconstruction parameters, each annotated with quality scores by three clinical experts using a four-point scale. Leveraging this dataset, we conduct a comprehensive benchmark evaluation of 26 full-reference and no-reference IQA metrics and propose an IQA-driven ranking method capable of discerning subtle quality differences. This work establishes a reproducible, standardized benchmark and provides a valuable public resource to advance CBCT image quality evaluation.
📝 Abstract
Medical image quality plays a critical role in diagnostic accuracy, especially in X-ray-based imaging modalities such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), where image quality must be balanced against radiation dose. While expert visual evaluation remains the clinical standard for image quality evaluation, it is time-consuming, subjective and affected by inter-observer variability, emphasizing the need for reliable quantitative image quality assessment (IQA) methods. However, the development and validation of such IQA methods have been limited by the lack of publicly available CBCT datasets with expert image quality annotations. In this study, we provide the first open-access CBCT IQA dataset containing 1,764 annotated image slices acquired using systematic variations in image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Three clinical experts graded the overall image quality and a predefined regions of interest (ROI) using a four-level scoring scheme. In addition, we benchmark 26 full reference- and no reference-based IQA measures against expert annotations and introduce an exploratory IQA measure-based ranking capable of distinguishing subtle image quality differences. This dataset introduced a standardized benchmark for future CBCT IQA research and provides a valuable resource for the development and validation of new IQA methods, enabling reproducible research and advancing CBCT IQA.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

CBCT
image quality assessment
annotated dataset
benchmarking
medical imaging
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

CBCT
image quality assessment
public dataset
benchmarking
expert annotation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Sepideh Hatamikia
Austrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT), Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
A
Anna Breger
Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics (DAMTP), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
C
Clemens Karner
Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
B
Birgit Pohn
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria; Faculty Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien, Vienna, Austria
P
Poorya MohammadiNasab
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
M
Martin Buschmann
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
S
Stephanie Nougaret
Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, PINKCC lab U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
L
Laura Haddad
Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, PINKCC lab U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
A
Ali Abbasian Ardakani
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
A
Afshin Mohammadi
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Science, Urmia, Iran
P
Paul Apfaltrer
Clinical Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Wolfgang Birkfellner
Wolfgang Birkfellner
Medical University Vienna
A
Alfred Pohl
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria; Clinical Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, University Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Ander Biguri
Ander Biguri
Assistant Research Professor, University of Cambridge
Tomographyinverse problemsPETCTmachine learning
Gernot Kronreif
Gernot Kronreif
ACMIT Gmbh, CSO
Medical technology development
Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
DAMTP, University of Cambridge
MathematicsComputer ScienceMedical imaginginverse problems
T
Tess Reynolds
Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia