Development of FDD-ON: an Ontology for VAV HVAC System Fault Detection and Diagnostics

📅 2026-07-31
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of information silos in fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) for variable air volume (VAV) HVAC systems, which arise from data heterogeneity and semantic ambiguity. To this end, the authors propose FDD-ON, the first structured semantic framework specifically designed for this domain. Built upon modular ontology engineering and knowledge graph techniques, FDD-ON formally models system components, fault types, symptoms, impacts, and their causal relationships, providing a unified controlled vocabulary and a comprehensive knowledge base. The framework enables machine-interpretable diagnostic reasoning and enhances system interoperability. Experimental validation on public datasets demonstrates that FDD-ON serves as a foundational semantic infrastructure for developing transparent, scalable, and AI-driven FDD applications.
📝 Abstract
Fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) technology is essential for improving HVAC system reliability, energy efficiency, and maintenance effectiveness. However, effective deployment of FDD solutions in buildings requires structured domain knowledge that can bridge heterogeneous data sources, diverse equipment types, and varied diagnostic outputs. Limited data interpretability and interoperability within the FDD domain have led to fragmented information silos, hindering the implementation of FDD and related applications, such as the digital twin-enabled FDD frameworks and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven maintenance decision-making systems. This paper presents an FDD Ontology (FDD-ON), a modular and extensible ontology to formally represent variable air volume (VAV) HVAC system components, fault types, symptom statuses, fault impacts and associated attributes. FDD-ON integrates HVAC system FDD semantics to provide comprehensive representations of fault and symptom attributes, supported by the well-defined controlled vocabulary. Additionally, FDD-ON offers comprehensive fault, symptom, and impact libraries to capture a broad spectrum of operational abnormalities and their consequences in VAV HVAC systems. Through explicit contributing cause-fault-symptom-impact relations, FDD-ON serves as a machine-interpretable basis for querying diagnostic knowledge, mapping heterogeneous FDD outputs, and developing interoperable FDD-related applications. FDD-ON is evaluated using publicly available VAV HVAC system datasets and demonstrated through FDD development applications. Results indicate that FDD-ON provides a foundational semantic framework for advancing scalable, transparent, and interoperable FDD solutions across various applications.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

fault detection and diagnostics
HVAC systems
interoperability
data interpretability
ontology
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Ontology
Fault Detection and Diagnostics (FDD)
HVAC Systems
Interoperability
Semantic Framework
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Yimin Chen
Yimin Chen
City University of Hong Kong
Medical imagingComputer Vision
Brian Fricke
Brian Fricke
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Refrigerationthermodynamicsthermal propertiescoolingfreezing
Bo Shen
Bo Shen
Oak Ridge National Lab
heat pump technologiesthermal system modelingbuilding energy modeling
J
Jamie Lian
Building Technologies Research and Integration Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, U.S.
Mingkan Zhang
Mingkan Zhang
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
J
James Lo
Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Department, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St. Philadelphia, PA 94706, U.S.
Y
Yun Zhang
Lu+S Engineers. 4924 Dominion Blvd, Glen Allen, VA 23060, U.S.
S
Shi Ye
Merck & Co. 126 E Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ 07065, U.S.
J
Jiajing Huang
School of Data Science and Analytics, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA 30060, U.S.
H
Han Hu
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, U.S.
C
Chujie Lu
Department of Architectural Engineering and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 134, 2628 BL Delft, Netherlands
Rui Tang
Rui Tang
University College London
Building energydynamic simulationdemand responsesmart grid
G
George Zhuang
Faculty of Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada