🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses “model collapse”—the progressive degradation in performance observed when language models are iteratively trained on synthetic text data—by identifying a negative correlation between synthetic data proportion and model performance, alongside n-gram over-concentration. We propose a token-level editing method grounded in human-written text and provide the first theoretical proof that this strategy strictly bounds test error, thereby provably preventing collapse. Furthermore, we introduce a distribution-aware semi-synthetic data paradigm that overcomes the inherent degeneration bottleneck of purely generative data. Through multi-stage pretraining and fine-tuning experiments across diverse downstream tasks, our approach significantly mitigates model collapse, yielding up to a 3.2% absolute accuracy improvement. Empirical results demonstrate the superiority and robustness of semi-synthetic data over fully synthetic alternatives.
📝 Abstract
Model collapse in synthetic data indicates that iterative training on self-generated data leads to a gradual decline in performance. With the proliferation of AI models, synthetic data will fundamentally reshape the web data ecosystem. Future GPT-${n}$ models will inevitably be trained on a blend of synthetic and human-produced data. In this paper, we focus on two questions: what is the impact of synthetic data on language model training, and how to synthesize data without model collapse? We first pre-train language models across different proportions of synthetic data, revealing a negative correlation between the proportion of synthetic data and model performance. We further conduct statistical analysis on synthetic data to uncover distributional shift phenomenon and over-concentration of n-gram features. Inspired by the above findings, we propose token editing on human-produced data to obtain semi-synthetic data. As a proof of concept, we theoretically demonstrate that token-level editing can prevent model collapse, as the test error is constrained by a finite upper bound. We conduct extensive experiments on pre-training from scratch, continual pre-training, and supervised fine-tuning. The results validate our theoretical proof that token-level editing improves data quality and enhances model performance.