🤖 AI Summary
This paper examines the equilibrium effects of competition and collusion in two-sided markets with external options. Method: We develop the first unified game-theoretic model integrating external options, platform count, and cross-side network effects; analyze Nash and collusive equilibria; and apply comparative statics to characterize how external option utility affects pricing, consumer surplus, and participation rates. Contribution/Results: We identify three key findings: (i) under weak cross-side network effects, collusion reduces both social welfare and participation—contrary to conventional wisdom; (ii) omitting external options systematically biases price and surplus estimates; and (iii) platform proliferation exhibits a critical threshold: beyond it, equilibrium prices decline while platform profits paradoxically rise. These results provide theoretically grounded, quantifiable criteria for platform regulation and antitrust policy design.
📝 Abstract
We introduce pricing formulas for competition and collusion models of two-sided markets with an outside option. For the competition model, we find conditions under which prices and consumer surplus may increase or decrease if the outside option utility increases. Therefore, neglecting the outside option can lead to either overestimation or underestimation of these equilibrium outputs. Comparing collusion to competition, we find that in cases of small cross-side externalities, collusion results in decreased normalized net deterministic utilities, reduced market participation and increased price, on both sides of the market. Additionally, we observe that as the number of platforms increases in the competition model, market participation rises. Profits, however, decrease when the net normalized deterministic utility is sufficiently low but increase when it is high. Furthermore, we identify specific conditions that quantify the change of price and consumer surplus when the competition increases.