🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the challenge of formally modeling and effectively reasoning about independence under incomplete information, where standard independence notions lack adequate semantic foundations. Methodologically, it integrates database theory, modal logic, and computational complexity analysis, leveraging model checking and implication reasoning to systematically characterize the decidability, axiomatization completeness, and data/joint complexity bounds of the independence implication problem. Key contributions include: (i) establishing NP-completeness of the general independence implication problem, and Π₂^p-completeness under integrity constraints; (ii) proposing a novel semantics based on *possible* and *necessary* independence, which significantly reduces computational overhead for schema updates and query answering; and (iii) providing a rigorous theoretical foundation and efficient algorithms for probabilistic reasoning and knowledge representation in incomplete information settings.
📝 Abstract
We initiate an investigation how the fundamental concept of independence can be represented effectively in the presence of incomplete information. The concepts of possible and certain independence are proposed, and first results regarding the axiomatisability and computational complexity of implication problems associated with these concepts are established. In addition, several results for the data and the combined complexity of model checking are presented. The findings help reduce computational overheads associated with the processing of updates and answering of queries.