Reconstructed holograms and explanation-aware evaluation for low-cost computational pollen analysis in veterinary cytology

📅 2026-09-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究使用重建全息图和解释感知评估方法,提高了低成本计算花粉分析的准确性,并通过AHIR协议验证了模型在模态变化下的可靠性。
📝 Abstract
Automated pollen analysis supports veterinary cytology, but brightfield microscopy is costlier and more complex than lens-less digital in-line holographic microscopy. We evaluate whether reconstructed holograms can narrow this gap and whether model explanations remain reliable under modality change. Six pollen species were imaged by brightfield and holographic microscopy. Raw, single back-propagation and iterative phase retrieval holograms were evaluated with YOLOv26s detection and MobileNetV4 classification after anchor-based annotation transfer. Six attribution methods were assessed for spatial grounding and faithfulness with the Attribution Health Inspection and Repair (AHIR) protocol, which tests model brittleness under weak noise and corrects attribution-map granularity when needed. Brightfield achieved 0.6890 mAP50-95 (0.8865 mAP50) for detection and 0.9687 macro-F1 (0.9705 accuracy) for classification. Reconstructed holograms narrowed the gap with a task-dependent split: p-type was strongest for detection at 0.5324 mAP50-95 (0.8229 mAP50), while r-type was strongest for classification at 0.7695 macro-F1 (0.7866 accuracy), both far above raw-hologram baselines. Activation-based explanations localized strongly on grains, and region-based methods retained ~60 to ~80% of faithfulness under holography. The holographic detector was highly brittle to weak perturbations, saturating deletion-based evaluation while insertion remained informative. Pixel-level gradient explanations approached random floor, yet spatial smoothing restored p-type gradient faithfulness from 0.05 to 0.51. For holographic classification, perturbation-based explanations remained faithful while gradient-based methods fell below random floor. Reconstruction improves low-cost holographic pollen analysis, while AHIR distinguishes genuine attribution failure from artifacts caused by model brittleness and map granularity.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

reconstructed holograms
low-cost computational pollen analysis
model explanations reliability
veterinary cytology
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Reconstructed Holograms
Explanation-aware Evaluation
Low-cost Pollen Analysis
Attribution Health Inspection and Repair (AHIR)
Model Brittleness
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Swarn Warshaneyan
Institute of Electronics and Computer Science (EDI), Riga, Latvia
J
Joial Danyal
Institute of Electronics and Computer Science (EDI), Riga, Latvia
Blaž Cugmas
Blaž Cugmas
Leading Researcher, University of Latvia
Veterinary biophotonicsBiomedical opticsVeterinary dermatology
M
Mindaugas Tamošiūnas
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
E
Edgars Kviesis-Kipge
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
K
Kirishanth Manivannan
Institute of Electronics and Computer Science (EDI), Riga, Latvia
R
Roberts Kadiķis
Institute of Electronics and Computer Science (EDI), Riga, Latvia