RLVR$^{2}$: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rubric-based Ranking

📅 2026-09-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
为解决多维度评分标准下的强化学习问题,提出RLVR²方法,通过转换评分并恢复潜在效用,避免了不同标准间的直接比较,提高了模型性能。
📝 Abstract
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is expanding from tasks with well-defined correctness signals, such as mathematics and code, toward multifaceted quality requirements specified by multi-dimensional rubrics. Since policy optimization consumes one scalar per rollout, rubric-based pipelines must map multiple criterion scores into a scalar reward. This aggregation is often treated as score scaling, but it implicitly determines how quality dimensions trade off during training. The prevailing practice, normalizing each criterion and taking a linear combination, assumes that cardinal score differences are comparable across criteria and that gains on one criterion compensate for failures on another; both assumptions are unreliable when criteria are semantically heterogeneous. We propose Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rubric-based Ranking (RLVR$^2$), a verifiable ranking paradigm for rubric-based RLVR. For each criterion, RLVR$^2$ converts rubric scores into criterion-specific within-group ordinal outcomes, recovers a latent utility from the resulting comparison matrix, and merges these utilities into one training signal. By retaining only within-group ordering and discarding raw score magnitudes, RLVR$^2$ avoids calibrating heterogeneous rubric scales. It further supports objective-preserving attribute adjustment: auxiliary attributes that correlate with observed rankings but are not training objectives can enter the estimation without expanding the rubric or rewarding them directly. Across three model scales and 16 benchmarks, RLVR$^2$ consistently outperforms representative rubric-based baselines, achieving the best overall performance on most benchmarks at every scale. Analysis shows it controls systematic effects tied to reasoning efficiency and response formatting while preserving the quality objective.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Reinforcement Learning
Verifiable Rubric-based Ranking
Rubric Scores
Criterion Aggregation
Ordinal Outcomes
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Reinforcement Learning
Verifiable Rubric-based Ranking
Ordinal Outcomes
Latent Utility
Attribute Adjustment
🔎 Similar Papers
2024-05-172024 IEEE 13th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS)Citations: 0
H
Hao Li
ERNIE Team, Baidu Inc.
Z
Zhengkun Zhang
ERNIE Team, Baidu Inc.
G
Gangqiang Hu
ERNIE Team, Baidu Inc.
Z
Zhen Zhang
ERNIE Team, Baidu Inc.
Y
Yude Gao
ERNIE Team, Baidu Inc.
Dai Dai
Dai Dai
Baidu
Natural Language ProcessingNatural Language UnderstandingInformation ExtractionText MiningSentiment Analysis
Jing Liu
Jing Liu
Baidu Inc.
Large Language ModelInformation RetrievalAgents