Marginal Calibration Does Not Compose: Hidden Dependence in Modular Robot Navigation

📅 2026-09-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究解决了模块化机器人导航中因假设独立性导致的不确定性校准问题,通过模拟展示了建模联合协方差可恢复下游校准并提高系统性能。
📝 Abstract
Robotic systems are typically composed of multiple independently developed modules that work together to perceive, predict, and act in the environment. Although each module may perform reliably in isolation, composing them does not necessarily preserve uncertainty calibration at the system level. In this work, we show that well-calibrated component interfaces do not necessarily produce calibrated downstream behavior after composition. Using a moving-obstacle prediction pipeline, we demonstrate that position and velocity estimators can each appear well calibrated individually, yet differences in how their error are correlated lead to substantially different estimates of future-state uncertainty. Consequently, assuming independence can make the system either overly confident or unnecessarily conservative, directly influencing downstream planning decisions and safety. Through simulations, we show that modeling the joint covariance restores downstream calibration and improves system performance, whereas dependence-robust uncertainty bounds enhance safety at the cost of increased conservatism. Our findings reveal a fundamental limitation of independently validating robotic modules and highlight the need for interfaces that communicate dependence information or support direct system-level calibration.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

uncertainty calibration
modular robot navigation
independent modules
downstream behavior
dependence information
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

uncertainty calibration
joint covariance
dependence-robust uncertainty bounds
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
R
Rista Baral
University of Delaware