Transporting summary measures of relative effects from randomised trials to the treated patient population: an application to breast cancer endocrine therapy

๐Ÿ“… 2026-09-21
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
่ฏฅ็ ”็ฉถ้€š่ฟ‡็ป“ๅˆๅธธ่ง„ๆŠค็†ๆ•ฐๆฎๅ’Œ้šๆœบ่ฏ•้ชŒ็š„็›ธๅฏนๆ•ˆๅบ”ๆŒ‡ๆ ‡๏ผŒ่งฃๅ†ณไบ†ไผฐ็ฎ—ๆฒป็–—็ปๅฏนๆ•ˆๅบ”็š„้—ฎ้ข˜๏ผŒไปฅ่ฏ„ไผฐไนณ่…บ็™Œๅ†…ๅˆ†ๆณŒ็–—ๆณ•็š„ๆ•ˆๆžœใ€‚
๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Randomised trials often report relative treatment effects, such as risk ratios and hazard ratios, for trial populations. Clinical decision-making, however, often benefits from estimates of absolute treatment effects in the population eligible for treatment. Trial participants may not represent this target population well, and restrictions on access to individual participant trial data can further complicate absolute effect estimation. Routine care data are often representative of the target population but may be subject to uncontrolled confounding. We consider estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), an absolute measure, by combining a representative sample of treated routine care patients with summary measures (i.e., estimated risk or hazard ratios) from either a randomised trial or a meta-analysis of trials. Under marginal or conditional transportability assumptions, the ATT is shown to be identifiable. The implications of collapsibility of the effect measure on transportability are discussed, and plug-in estimators of the ATT are presented. Simulation studies are used to assess finite sample performance of the estimators in a range of settings. The proposed methods are applied to estimate the ATT of endocrine therapy on 15-year breast cancer mortality using results from a meta-analysis of randomised trials and England's National Disease Registration Service.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

randomised trials
absolute treatment effects
average treatment effect on the treated (ATT)
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

average treatment effect on the treated (ATT)
summary measures
transportability assumptions
collapsibility of effect measure
plug-in estimators
๐Ÿ’ผ Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
Bonnie E. Shook-Sa
Bonnie E. Shook-Sa
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
causal inferencesurvey sampling
P
Paul N. Zivich
Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
C
Carolyn Taylor
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
D
David Dodwell
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
J
Jake Probert
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
S
Sarah C Darby
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
P
Paul McGale
Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK