🤖 AI Summary
This study identifies a fundamental tension in cryptocurrency systems between “decentralized architecture” and “centralized trust practices”: although blockchain technology promises trustless interaction, users actively rely on centralized trust anchors—including exchanges, influencers, and core development teams.
Method: Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 13 diverse stakeholders and mixed-method analysis of over 3,000 Reddit discussions, the research empirically investigates user trust behaviors.
Contribution/Results: It provides the first systematic validation of the paradox that decentralized systems depend on centralized trust. Key drivers include psychological accountability needs and barriers to self-custody; reliance on centralized intermediaries is significantly stronger among novices and non-technical users. These findings offer critical empirical grounding for designing next-generation protocols that reconcile usability, inclusivity, and substantive decentralization—without compromising security or autonomy.
📝 Abstract
Blockchain technology promises to democratize finance and promote social equity through decentralization, but questions remain about whether current implementations advance or hinder these goals. Through a mixed-methods study combining semi-structured interviews with 13 diverse blockchain stakeholders and analysis of over 3,000 cryptocurrency discussions on Reddit, we examine how trust manifests in cryptocurrency ecosystems despite their decentralized architecture. Our findings uncover that users actively seek out and create centralized trust anchors, such as established exchanges, prominent community figures, and recognized development teams, contradicting blockchain's fundamental promise of trustless interactions. We identify how this contradiction arises from users' mental need for accountability and their reluctance to shoulder the full responsibility of self-custody. The study also reveals how these centralized trust patterns disproportionately impact different user groups, with newer and less technical users showing stronger preferences for centralized intermediaries. This work contributes to our understanding of the inherent tensions between theoretical decentralization and practical implementation in cryptocurrency systems, highlighting the persistent role of centralized trust in supposedly trustless environments.