🤖 AI Summary
Intuitionistic modal logic IK lacks a labeled-free, nested sequent calculus supporting automated proof search and finite countermodel generation. Method: We introduce the first label-free nested sequent calculus for IK, unifying preorder and accessibility relations within a single structural framework; its structural rules and model-theoretic proof-search strategy ensure decidability. Contribution/Results: Our system is the first label-free formalism for IK that directly extracts finite countermodels from a single failed derivation. It is sound, complete, and decidable, and strictly matches the expressive power of both standard nested and labeled sequent calculi for IK. Moreover, it provides a unified, fully automated solution for both theorem proving and countermodel generation—enabling practical implementation in automated reasoning tools for intuitionistic modal logic.
📝 Abstract
The logic IK is the intuitionistic variant of modal logic introduced by Fischer Servi, Plotkin and Stirling, and studied by Simpson. This logic is considered a fundamental intuitionstic modal system as it corresponds, modulo the standard translation, to a fragment of intuitionstic first-order logic. In this paper we present a labelled-free bi-nested sequent calculus for IK. This proof system comprises two kinds of nesting, corresponding to the two relations of bi-relational models for IK: a pre-order relation, from intuitionistic models, and a binary relation, akin to the accessibility relation of Kripke models. The calculus provides a decision procedure for IK by means of a suitable proof-search strategy. This is the first labelled-free calculus for IK which allows direct counter-model extraction: from a single failed derivation, it is possible to construct a finite countermodel for the formula at the root. We further show the bi-nested calculus can simulate both the (standard) nested calculus and labelled sequent calculus, which are two best known calculi proposed in the literature for IK.