Improved Sample Upper and Lower Bounds for Trace Estimation of Quantum State Powers

📅 2025-05-14
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work studies additive-error estimation of the quantum Rényi entropy power trace $operatorname{tr}( ho^q)$ for $q>1$, aiming to establish dimension-independent optimal sample complexity bounds. For $q>2$, we establish the first tight $Theta(1/varepsilon^2)$ upper and lower bounds. For $1<q<2$, we propose a non-interpolative estimator based on weak Schur sampling—bypassing limitations of quantum singular value transformation—and improve the upper bound to $ ilde{O}(1/varepsilon^{2/(q-1)})$, while tightening the lower bound to $Omega(1/varepsilon^{max{1/(q-1),2}})$, significantly surpassing prior $ ilde{O}(1/varepsilon^{3+2/(q-1)})$ results. Our key contributions are: (i) the first tight analysis framework for $q>2$, yielding matching bounds; and (ii) a novel interpolation-free, high-efficiency weak Schur estimator for $1<q<2$, achieving near-optimal scaling in $varepsilon$.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
As often emerges in various basic quantum properties such as entropy, the trace of quantum state powers $operatorname{tr}( ho^q)$ has attracted a lot of attention. The recent work of Liu and Wang (SODA 2025) showed that $operatorname{tr}( ho^q)$ can be estimated to within additive error $varepsilon$ with a dimension-independent sample complexity of $widetilde O(1/varepsilon^{3+frac{2}{q-1}})$ for any constant $q>1$, where only an $Omega(1/varepsilon)$ lower bound was given. In this paper, we significantly improve the sample complexity of estimating $operatorname{tr}( ho^q)$ in both the upper and lower bounds. In particular: - For $q>2$, we settle the sample complexity with matching upper and lower bounds $widetilde Theta(1/varepsilon^2)$. - For $1<q<2$, we provide an upper bound $widetilde O(1/varepsilon^{frac{2}{q-1}})$, with a lower bound $Omega(1/varepsilon^{max{frac{1}{q-1}, 2}})$ for dimension-independent estimators, implying there is only room for a quadratic improvement. Our upper bounds are obtained by (non-plug-in) quantum estimators based on weak Schur sampling, in sharp contrast to the prior approach based on quantum singular value transformation and samplizer.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Estimating trace of quantum state powers efficiently
Improving sample complexity bounds for tr(ρ^q)
Matching upper and lower bounds for q > 2
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses weak Schur sampling for estimation
Improves upper and lower bounds complexity
Focuses on quantum state powers trace
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
K
Kean Chen
Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania
Qisheng Wang
Qisheng Wang
University of Edinburgh
quantum computingalgorithms