Physics-Informed CNN-LSTM for Street-Scale Urban Flood Prediction: Reconciling Aggregate Accuracy and Street-Level Plausibility

📅 2026-07-27
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the tendency of existing deep learning models for urban flood forecasting to produce physically implausible street-scale inundation simulations—such as uphill flow or mass creation ex nihilo—that hinder real-world applicability. To resolve this, we propose a physics-informed CNN-LSTM architecture that embeds differentiable constraints for gravitational consistency, mass continuity, and a topographic wetness index (TWI)-modulated false-alarm penalty directly into the loss function. Evaluated on the Norfolk dataset, the model achieves near-zero gravity violations (~1e-6) and a street-channel recall of 0.77 ± 0.09. The TWI-modulated variant attains the highest street-level F1 score while maintaining the lowest mean absolute error (MAE), with its performance advantage markedly amplified under leave-one-storm-out testing.
📝 Abstract
Deep learning surrogate models trained with mean-squared-error loss produce statistically accurate but physically unconstrained flood predictions: water may flow uphill, appear spontaneously, or smooth over street-level corridors. We develop a physics-informed training framework for CNN-LSTM models that predict urban flood depths at 15 min intervals over a 128x128 spatial grid. Three differentiable penalty terms are embedded into the loss: (i) a gravity loss penalizing depth increases against the water-surface-elevation gradient, (ii) a continuity loss enforcing local mass conservation with rainfall-adaptive thresholds, and (iii) a topography-aware false-alarm penalty modulated by the topographic wetness index (TWI). We evaluate on the Norfolk, Virginia flood dataset spanning two storm events (August 2017 and September 2022, 300 samples), with all variants trained on identical splits and robustness assessed over repeated random splits and leave-one-storm-out tests. A road-proximal evaluation restricted to a TWI-derived street mask quantifies street-level skill. The physics-constrained model achieves near-zero gravity violations (order 1e-6) and the highest street-channel recall (0.77 +/- 0.09 vs 0.44 +/- 0.10 for the unconstrained baseline), the capability most relevant to traffic routing, and its advantage more than doubles on a held-out storm; a uniform false-alarm variant attains 16% lower mean absolute error but suppresses street recall to 0.25. The TWI-modulated penalty reconciles this trade-off: it improves on the uniform variant on every metric, recovering 60% higher street recall at the lowest MAE among constrained variants and the best street-level F1. These results expose a fundamental tension between aggregate pixel-level error and application-specific physical plausibility, and show that terrain-aware loss modulation offers a principled resolution.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

urban flood prediction
physics-informed learning
street-level plausibility
physical consistency
deep learning surrogate models
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

physics-informed deep learning
urban flood prediction
CNN-LSTM
topographic wetness index
mass conservation
L
Luc D’Costa
Chandra Robot Autonomy Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA; Link Lab, Multidisciplinary Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
Y
Yidi Wang
Link Lab, Multidisciplinary Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA; Hydroinformatics Research Group, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
Jonathan L. Goodall
Jonathan L. Goodall
Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Director of Link Lab, University of Virginia
hydroinformaticsurban hydrologyfloodingsmart cities
Rohan Chandra
Rohan Chandra
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Virginia
Multi-Robot SystemsMulti-Agent SystemsAutonomous DrivingRobotics