On the relevance of APIs facing fairwashed audits

📅 2023-05-23
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 1
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Online platforms offer algorithmic compliance audits via proprietary APIs, yet these are vulnerable to “fairwashing”—intentional manipulation that undermines regulatory effectiveness. Method: We propose a collaborative auditing paradigm integrating web scraping with API calls, detecting manipulation through consistency discrepancies between their responses. We formally define “proxy consistency,” revealing an inherent trade-off between audit robustness and API dependency, and develop a Pareto-optimal auditing strategy framework for multi-objective decision-making. Contributions/Results: Theoretical analysis and simulation experiments demonstrate that high-quality consistency proxies enable credible, API-free audits; pure API-based auditing exhibits fundamental detection limits; and hybrid strategies significantly improve manipulation identification. Our work establishes a verifiable, scalable theoretical and practical foundation for anti-manipulation regulatory auditing.
📝 Abstract
Recent legislation required AI platforms to provide APIs for regulators to assess their compliance with the law. Research has nevertheless shown that platforms can manipulate their API answers through fairwashing. Facing this threat for reliable auditing, this paper studies the benefits of the joint use of platform scraping and of APIs. In this setup, we elaborate on the use of scraping to detect manipulated answers: since fairwashing only manipulates API answers, exploiting scraps may reveal a manipulation. To abstract the wide range of specific API-scrap situations, we introduce a notion of proxy that captures the consistency an auditor might expect between both data sources. If the regulator has a good proxy of the consistency, then she can easily detect manipulation and even bypass the API to conduct her audit. On the other hand, without a good proxy, relying on the API is necessary, and the auditor cannot defend against fairwashing. We then simulate practical scenarios in which the auditor may mostly rely on the API to conveniently conduct the audit task, while maintaining her chances to detect a potential manipulation. To highlight the tension between the audit task and the API fairwashing detection task, we identify Pareto-optimal strategies in a practical audit scenario. We believe this research sets the stage for reliable audits in practical and manipulation-prone setups.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Detecting manipulation in algorithm audits via dual data sources
Ensuring compliance of decision-making algorithms with legislation
Balancing audit reliability and fairwashing detection effectively
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Two-Source Audit setup for fairwashing detection
Leveraging data proxies to identify discrepancies
Pareto-optimal balance in audit objectives
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
Univ Rennes | Inria | LAAS/CNRS
Jade Garcia Bourrée
Jade Garcia Bourrée
PhD Student, Inria, Univ Rennes
E
E. L. Merrer
Univ Rennes, Inria
G
Gilles Trédan
LAAS/CNRS
B
B. Rottembourg
Inria