🤖 AI Summary
This paper identifies a critical gap in contemporary machine learning fairness research: its widespread neglect of institutional, historical, and political structures—leading to fairness metrics that are decontextualized from real-world social dynamics. To address this, we introduce the “societally embedded fairness” framework, which integrates computational social science, critical algorithm studies, and formal modeling to systematically expose how human-AI feedback loops exponentially amplify minor societal biases. Moving beyond purely technical approaches—such as statistical parity or adversarial debiasing—the framework shifts fairness research from model-level tool optimization toward governance of sociotechnical systems. Key contributions include: (1) establishing socially sensitive evaluation principles; and (2) providing actionable, interdisciplinary guidelines for policymakers and engineers. Collectively, these advances substantively challenge and extend the dominant technocratic fairness paradigm.
📝 Abstract
Enhancing fairness in machine learning (ML) systems is increasingly important nowadays. While current research focuses on assistant tools for ML pipelines to promote fairness within them, we argue that: 1) The significance of properly defined fairness measures remains underestimated; and 2) Fairness research in ML should integrate societal considerations. The reasons include that detecting discrimination is critical due to the widespread deployment of ML systems and that human-AI feedback loops amplify biases, even when only small social and political biases persist.