Automated Real-time Assessment of Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection AI Using an Ensembled Monitoring Model (EMM)

πŸ“… 2025-05-16
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Current AI tools in radiology lack real-time trustworthiness monitoring post-deployment, exacerbating clinicians’ cognitive load and undermining diagnostic reliability. To address this, we propose an Ensemble Monitoring Model (EMM)β€”a black-box-compatible framework that enables non-intrusive, case-wise real-time confidence quantification and tiered clinical action recommendations for intracranial hemorrhage detection. EMM innovatively leverages multi-expert consensus to estimate prediction uncertainty without requiring access to model internals, integrating ensemble learning, probabilistic uncertainty modeling, and clinical workflow alignment. Validated externally on 2,919 multicenter CT scans, EMM significantly improves confidence calibration and stratification accuracy. This work establishes the first deployable technical specification for real-time AI monitoring and provides evidence-based best-practice guidelines for clinical integration of commercial AI systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools for radiology are commonly unmonitored once deployed. The lack of real-time case-by-case assessments of AI prediction confidence requires users to independently distinguish between trustworthy and unreliable AI predictions, which increases cognitive burden, reduces productivity, and potentially leads to misdiagnoses. To address these challenges, we introduce Ensembled Monitoring Model (EMM), a framework inspired by clinical consensus practices using multiple expert reviews. Designed specifically for black-box commercial AI products, EMM operates independently without requiring access to internal AI components or intermediate outputs, while still providing robust confidence measurements. Using intracranial hemorrhage detection as our test case on a large, diverse dataset of 2919 studies, we demonstrate that EMM successfully categorizes confidence in the AI-generated prediction, suggesting different actions and helping improve the overall performance of AI tools to ultimately reduce cognitive burden. Importantly, we provide key technical considerations and best practices for successfully translating EMM into clinical settings.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Lack of real-time AI prediction confidence monitoring
Need to distinguish reliable vs unreliable AI outputs
Black-box commercial AI products require external assessment
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Ensembled Monitoring Model for AI confidence assessment
Works with black-box AI without internal access
Improves AI performance and reduces cognitive burden
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Z
Zhongnan Fang
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University
A
Andrew Johnston
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University
L
Lina Cheuy
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University
H
Hye Sun Na
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University
Magdalini Paschali
Magdalini Paschali
Postdoctoral Scholar, Stanford University
Deep LearningComputer VisionMedical Imaging
C
Camila Gonzalez
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University
B
Bonnie A. Armstrong
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University
Arogya Koirala
Arogya Koirala
Stanford University School of Medicine
Medical AIAI Evaluation and MonitoringGeospatial AI
D
Derrick Laurel
3D and Quantitative Imaging Laboratory (3DQ), School of Medicine, Stanford University
A
Andrew Walker Campion
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University
Michael Iv
Michael Iv
Stanford University
NeuroimagingBrain tumor imaging
A
Akshay S. Chaudhari
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; AI Development and Evaluation Laboratory (AIDE), School of Medicine, Stanford University; Department of Biomedical Data Science, School of Medicine, Stanford University
D
David B. Larson
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; AI Development and Evaluation Laboratory (AIDE), School of Medicine, Stanford University