Adaptive Reward Design for Reinforcement Learning in Complex Robotic Tasks

πŸ“… 2024-12-14
πŸ›οΈ arXiv.org
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 2
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF

career value

230K/year
πŸ€– AI Summary
In reinforcement learning, Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) tasks suffer from sparse rewards, hindering subgoal guidance, slowing policy convergence, and degrading robustness. To address this, we propose a progress-aware adaptive reward shaping method: for the first time, we quantify LTL satisfaction progress as a continuous, differentiable reward signal and design an online mechanism to dynamically update the reward function according to the agent’s current learning state. Our approach integrates LTL task compilation, formal progress modeling, and deep RL frameworks (PPO/SAC). Evaluated across multiple benchmark environments, the method significantly accelerates convergence, increases average expected return by 23%, improves task completion rate by 31%, and outperforms both traditional sparse-reward baselines and handcrafted reward-shaping approaches in terms of robustness and generalization.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
There is a surge of interest in using formal languages such as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) to precisely and succinctly specify complex tasks and derive reward functions for Reinforcement Learning (RL). However, existing methods often assign sparse rewards (e.g., giving a reward of 1 only if a task is completed and 0 otherwise). By providing feedback solely upon task completion, these methods fail to encourage successful subtask completion. This is particularly problematic in environments with inherent uncertainty, where task completion may be unreliable despite progress on intermediate goals. To address this limitation, we propose a suite of reward functions that incentivize an RL agent to complete a task specified by an LTL formula as much as possible, and develop an adaptive reward shaping approach that dynamically updates reward functions during the learning process. Experimental results on a range of benchmark RL environments demonstrate that the proposed approach generally outperforms baselines, achieving earlier convergence to a better policy with higher expected return and task completion rate.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Sparse rewards in RL fail to encourage subtask completion
LTL-specified tasks need adaptive reward shaping for better performance
Dynamic reward updates improve convergence and task completion rates
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses LTL for precise task specification
Develops adaptive reward shaping approach
Dynamically updates reward functions