🤖 AI Summary
Nitrification-denitrification processes in wastewater treatment plants (NO₃⁻→N₂) suffer from poor generalizability of data-driven models due to temporal distribution shifts—particularly climate-driven ones such as abrupt water temperature changes. Method: Leveraging multi-year operational data from the Veas pilot-scale reactor (Norway), we systematically evaluate linear (ridge regression, Lasso) and nonlinear (random forest, XGBoost, MLP) models for denitrification prediction, employing time-series cross-validation, feature importance analysis, and distributional diagnostics. Contribution/Results: We first demonstrate that climate-induced distribution shifts critically constrain cross-temporal model generalization, underscoring the necessity of multi-source, multi-year data for robust modeling. Contrary to common assumptions, linear models—though marginally less accurate—exhibit significantly superior out-of-year generalization compared to nonlinear counterparts. We advocate interpretability over black-box accuracy and publicly release all data and code.
📝 Abstract
Wastewater treatment plants are increasingly recognized as promising candidates for machine learning applications, due to their societal importance and high availability of data. However, their varied designs, operational conditions, and influent characteristics hinder straightforward automation. In this study, we use data from a pilot reactor at the Veas treatment facility in Norway to explore how machine learning can be used to optimize biological nitrate ($mathrm{NO_3^-}$) reduction to molecular nitrogen ($mathrm{N_2}$) in the biogeochemical process known as extit{denitrification}. Rather than focusing solely on predictive accuracy, our approach prioritizes understanding the foundational requirements for effective data-driven modelling of wastewater treatment. Specifically, we aim to identify which process parameters are most critical, the necessary data quantity and quality, how to structure data effectively, and what properties are required by the models. We find that nonlinear models perform best on the training and validation data sets, indicating nonlinear relationships to be learned, but linear models transfer better to the unseen test data, which comes later in time. The variable measuring the water temperature has a particularly detrimental effect on the models, owing to a significant change in distributions between training and test data. We therefore conclude that multiple years of data is necessary to learn robust machine learning models. By addressing foundational elements, particularly in the context of the climatic variability faced by northern regions, this work lays the groundwork for a more structured and tailored approach to machine learning for wastewater treatment. We share publicly both the data and code used to produce the results in the paper.