🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the formal modeling of correctness conditions for constraint-based causal learning algorithms. Method: We propose a unifying framework that decouples correctness conditions into two orthogonal components: (i) the relationship between the observational distribution and the true causal DAG, and (ii) constraints solely expressible in terms of the observed distribution—thereby unifying the theoretical foundations of classical algorithms such as PC. Contribution/Results: We derive the first exact correctness condition for the PC algorithm; prove that the sparse Markov representation condition is the weakest sufficient minimality condition among existing notions, and show that Pearl’s minimality alone cannot relax the faithfulness assumption. By integrating placeholder-based modeling, minimality analysis of maximal ancestral graphs and DAGs, and synergistic constraint testing with graph-theoretic inference, we establish a unified correctness verification framework. This clarifies the theoretical boundaries among faithfulness, minimality, and domain knowledge, significantly enhancing the interpretability and applicability of constraint-based causal discovery.
📝 Abstract
By representing any constraint-based causal learning algorithm via a placeholder property, we decompose the correctness condition into a part relating the distribution and the true causal graph, and a part that depends solely on the distribution. This provides a general framework to obtain correctness conditions for causal learning, and has the following implications. We provide exact correctness conditions for the PC algorithm, which are then related to correctness conditions of some other existing causal discovery algorithms. We show that the sparsest Markov representation condition is the weakest correctness condition resulting from existing notions of minimality for maximal ancestral graphs and directed acyclic graphs. We also reason that additional knowledge than just Pearl-minimality is necessary for causal learning beyond faithfulness.