๐ค AI Summary
In supervised fine-tuning of large language models, data selection typically prioritizes either quality or diversity, yet simultaneously optimizing both remains challenging.
Method: This paper proposes a unified optimization framework that models the dataset as a bipartite graph between sentences and n-grams, andโnoveltyโthe first formalization of data selection as a *coverage-constrained set cover problem*. It introduces a multiplicative priority function jointly encoding quality and diversity, integrated with a closed-loop greedy selection mechanism featuring dynamic graph updates and iterative re-scoring.
Contribution/Results: Extensive experiments across three backbone models and six mainstream benchmarks demonstrate consistent superiority over nine baselines: the method improves downstream task performance while reducing computational cost. Ablation studies further validate the critical role of instruction diversity in enhancing model generalization.
๐ Abstract
The performance of large language models (LLMs) is strongly influenced by the quality and diversity of data used during supervised fine-tuning (SFT). However, current data selection methods often prioritize one aspect over the other, resulting in suboptimal training outcomes. To address this, we formulate data selection as a set cover problem and present GraphFilter, a novel approach that balances both quality and diversity in data selection. GraphFilter models the dataset as a bipartite graph connecting sentences to their constituent n-grams, then employs a priority function that combines quality and diversity metrics multiplicatively. GraphFilter iteratively selects sentences with the highest priority, removes covered n-grams from the bipartite graph, and recomputes priorities to reflect the changing data landscape. We validate GraphFilter using three model backbones across six widely-used benchmarks, demonstrating that it outperforms nine existing baselines in both model performance and computational efficiency. Further analysis shows that our design choices lead to more effective subset selection, underscores the value of instruction diversity, and provides insights into how quality and diversity interact with different subset sizes.